Chen Jifei, Ming Moyu, Huang Shuangping, Wei Xuan, Wu Jinyan, Zhou Sufang, Ling Zhougui
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Molecular Medicine Research (Guangxi Medical University), Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 30;14:1417753. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417753. eCollection 2024.
The identification of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules (BPN and MPN) can significantly reduce mortality. However, a reliable and validated diagnostic model for clinical decision-making is still lacking.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electro chemiluminescent immunoassay were utilized to determine the serum concentrations of 7AABs (p53, GAGE7, PGP9.5, CAGE, MAGEA1, SOX2, GBU4-5), and 4TTMs (CYFR21, CEA, NSE and SCC) in 260 participants (72 BPNs and 188 early-stage MPNs), respectively. The malignancy probability was calculated using Artificial intelligence pulmonary nodule auxiliary diagnosis system, or Mayo model. Along with age, sex, smoking history and nodule size, 18 variables were enrolled for model development. Baseline comparison, univariate ROC analysis, variable correlation analysis, lasso regression, univariate and stepwise logistic regression, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to reduce and screen variables. A nomogram and DCA were built for model construction and clinical use. Training (60%) and validation (40%) cohorts were used to for model validation.
Age, CYFRA21_1, AI, PGP9.5, GAGE7, and GBU4_5 was screened out from 18 variables and utilized to establish the regression model for identifying BPN and early-stage MPN, as well as nomogram and DCA for clinical practical use. The AUC of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts were 0.884 and 0.820, respectively. Moreover, the calibration curve showed high coherence between the predicted and actual probability.
This diagnostic model and DCA could provide evidence for upgrading or maintaining the current clinical decision based on malignancy probability stratification. It enables low and moderate risk or ambiguous patients to benefit from more precise clinical decision stratification, more timely detection of malignant nodules, and early treatment.
鉴别良性和恶性肺结节(BPN和MPN)可显著降低死亡率。然而,目前仍缺乏一个可靠且经过验证的用于临床决策的诊断模型。
分别采用酶联免疫吸附测定法和电化学发光免疫分析法测定260名参与者(72例BPN和188例早期MPN)血清中7种自身抗体(p53、GAGE7、PGP9.5、CAGE、MAGEA1、SOX2、GBU4-5)和4种肿瘤标志物(CYFR21、CEA、NSE和SCC)的浓度。使用人工智能肺结节辅助诊断系统或梅奥模型计算恶性概率。连同年龄、性别、吸烟史和结节大小,共纳入18个变量用于模型构建。采用基线比较、单变量ROC分析、变量相关性分析、套索回归、单变量和逐步逻辑回归以及决策曲线分析(DCA)来减少和筛选变量。构建列线图和DCA用于模型构建和临床应用。使用训练队列(60%)和验证队列(40%)进行模型验证。
从18个变量中筛选出年龄、CYFRA21_1、人工智能、PGP9.5、GAGE7和GBU4_5,用于建立鉴别BPN和早期MPN的回归模型以及用于临床实际应用的列线图和DCA。训练队列和验证队列中列线图的AUC分别为0.884和0.820。此外,校准曲线显示预测概率与实际概率之间具有高度一致性。
该诊断模型和DCA可为基于恶性概率分层提升或维持当前临床决策提供依据。它使低、中度风险或情况不明确的患者能够从更精确的临床决策分层、更及时地检测出恶性结节以及早期治疗中获益。