Visioli Francesco, Del Rio Daniele, Fogliano Vincenzo, Marangoni Franca, Ricci Cristian, Poli Andrea
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Food and Drugs, Human Nutrition Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2025 Mar;79(3):177-180. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01515-8. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Several studies have linked adverse health effects to the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) according to the NOVA classification. However, whether the consumption of UPF is the actual causal factor for such health outcomes is still unknown. Indeed, different groups of UPF examined in the same epidemiologic study often show markedly different associations with the occurrence of the health endpoints. In this Comment, we discuss some such studies and point out that the available evidence on how different UPFs have been associated with health, as well as the results of studies examining specific food additives, call into question the possibility that ultra-processing per se is the real culprit. It is possible that other unaccounted for confounding factors play an important role. Future, urgently needed studies will clarify this issue.
根据“新食物分类法”(NOVA),多项研究已将超加工食品(UPF)的消费与不良健康影响联系起来。然而,UPF的消费是否是这些健康结果的实际因果因素仍不清楚。事实上,在同一流行病学研究中检查的不同组UPF通常与健康终点事件的发生呈现出明显不同的关联。在本评论中,我们讨论了其中一些研究,并指出关于不同UPF如何与健康相关联的现有证据,以及研究特定食品添加剂的研究结果,让人质疑超加工本身是否是真正的罪魁祸首。其他未被考虑的混杂因素可能起重要作用。未来迫切需要的研究将澄清这个问题。