Suppr超能文献

低剂量纳曲酮治疗纤维肌痛的疗效与安全性:一项采用序贯试验分析的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of low-dose naltrexone for the management of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

作者信息

Vatvani Akhil Deepak, Patel Pratik, Hariyanto Timotius Ivan, Yanto Theo Audi

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia.

Department of Medicine, Washington University of Health and Science, Belize, Central America, United States of America.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2024 Oct 1;37(4):367-378. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24202.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia is characterized by the presence of chronic widespread pain that may impair patient's quality of life. Currently, the use of naltrexone as a therapeutic agent for fibromyalgia is not supported by enough evidence, especially from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) for the management of fibromyalgia.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on the Scopus, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases up until May 20th, 2024. This review incorporates RCTs that examine the comparison between LDN and placebo in fibromyalgia patients. We employed random-effect models to analyze the odds ratio and mean difference (MD) for presentation of the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs with 222 fibromyalgia patients were incorporated. The results of our meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in pain scores (MD: -0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.20, -0.51, < 0.001, = 33%) and higher increment in pressure pain threshold (MD: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.25, < 0.001, = 0%) among fibromyalgia patients who received LDN than those who only received a placebo. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire revised and pain catastrophizing scale did not differ significantly between the two groups. LDN was also associated with higher incidence of vivid dreams and nausea, but showed no significant difference with the placebo in terms of serious adverse events, headache, diarrhea, and dizziness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the efficacy of LDN in mitigating pain symptoms for fibromyalgia patients with a relatively good safety profile.

摘要

背景

纤维肌痛的特征是存在慢性广泛性疼痛,这可能会损害患者的生活质量。目前,使用纳曲酮作为纤维肌痛的治疗药物缺乏足够的证据支持,尤其是来自随机对照试验(RCT)的证据。本研究旨在分析低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)治疗纤维肌痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

截至2024年5月20日,在Scopus、Medline、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了全面检索。本综述纳入了检验LDN与安慰剂在纤维肌痛患者中比较的RCT。我们采用随机效应模型分析结果呈现的比值比和平均差(MD)。

结果

共纳入4项RCT,涉及222例纤维肌痛患者。我们的荟萃分析结果显示,与仅接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受LDN的纤维肌痛患者疼痛评分显著降低(MD:-0.86,95%置信区间[CI]:-1.20,-0.51,<0.001,I² = 33%),压力疼痛阈值升高幅度更大(MD:0.17,95%CI:0.08,0.25,<0.001,I² = 0%)。两组在修订的纤维肌痛影响问卷和疼痛灾难化量表方面无显著差异。LDN还与生动梦境和恶心的发生率较高相关,但在严重不良事件、头痛、腹泻和头晕方面与安慰剂无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明LDN对减轻纤维肌痛患者的疼痛症状有效,且安全性相对较好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0b9/11450306/1deaa0aa58f8/kjp-37-4-367-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验