Phase II Randomized Study of Maintenance Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With SLFN11 Positive Extensive-Stage SCLC: S1929.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the addition of a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib to maintenance immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab after frontline chemoimmunotherapy improved outcomes in patients with Schlafen 11 (SLFN11)-positive extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed SLFN11 expressing (H-score ≥ 1, evaluated centrally) ES-SCLC were randomized to maintenance atezolizumab (A) versus atezolizumab plus talazoparib (AT) after frontline chemotherapy plus atezolizumab. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) using a one-sided 10% level stratified log-rank test. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. The target sample size was 84 eligible patients.

RESULTS

From June 15, 2020, to December 15, 2022, 106 eligible patients were randomized (54 to AT and 52 to A). Progression-free survival was improved with AT versus A (hazard ratio = 0.66, 80% confidence interval: 0.50-0.86, one-sided p = 0.019) with a median PFS of 2.9 and 2.4 months; overall survival was not different between groups (hazard ratio = 0.98, 80% confidence interval: 0.71-1.36, one-sided p = 0.47). Grade 3 and higher non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17% of patients with AT and 14% of patients with A. Grade 3 and higher hematological treatment-related adverse events were more common in AT (50%) than in A (4%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Maintenance AT improved PFS in patients with SLFN11-positive ES-SCLC that did not progress after initial chemo-immunotherapy. Hematologic toxicity, primarily grade 3 anemia, was increased with AT, as expected. Prospective biomarker selection was demonstrated, paving the way for future evaluation of novel therapies in molecularly defined SCLC populations.