Drew Yvette, Zenke Frank T, Curtin Nicola J
BC Cancer Vancouver Centre and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Research Unit Oncology, EMD Serono, Billerica, MA, USA.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025 Jan;24(1):19-39. doi: 10.1038/s41573-024-01060-w. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
The DNA damage response (DDR) is a network of proteins that coordinate DNA repair and cell-cycle checkpoints to prevent damage being transmitted to daughter cells. DDR defects lead to genomic instability, which enables tumour development, but they also create vulnerabilities that can be used for cancer therapy. Historically, this vulnerability has been taken advantage of using DNA-damaging cytotoxic drugs and radiotherapy, which are more toxic to tumour cells than to normal tissues. However, the discovery of the unique sensitivity of tumours defective in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway to PARP inhibition led to the approval of six PARP inhibitors worldwide and to a focus on making use of DDR defects through the development of other DDR-targeting drugs. Here, we analyse the lessons learnt from PARP inhibitor development and how these may be applied to new targets to maximize success. We explore why, despite so much research, no other DDR inhibitor class has been approved, and only a handful have advanced to later-stage clinical trials. We discuss why more reliable predictive biomarkers are needed, explore study design from past and current trials, and suggest alternative models for monotherapy and combination studies. Targeting multiple DDR pathways simultaneously and potential combinations with anti-angiogenic agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors are also discussed.
DNA损伤反应(DDR)是一个蛋白质网络,可协调DNA修复和细胞周期检查点,以防止损伤传递给子细胞。DDR缺陷会导致基因组不稳定,从而促进肿瘤发展,但同时也会产生可用于癌症治疗的脆弱性。从历史上看,利用DNA损伤性细胞毒性药物和放射疗法利用了这种脆弱性,这些方法对肿瘤细胞的毒性比对正常组织的毒性更大。然而,发现同源重组DNA修复途径缺陷的肿瘤对PARP抑制具有独特的敏感性,这导致全球六种PARP抑制剂获得批准,并促使人们专注于通过开发其他DDR靶向药物来利用DDR缺陷。在此,我们分析了从PARP抑制剂开发中学到的经验教训,以及如何将这些经验应用于新靶点以实现最大成功。我们探讨了尽管进行了大量研究,但为何没有其他DDR抑制剂类别获得批准,只有少数几种进入后期临床试验。我们讨论了为何需要更可靠的预测生物标志物,探讨过去和当前试验的研究设计,并提出单药治疗和联合研究的替代模型。还讨论了同时靶向多个DDR途径以及与抗血管生成剂或免疫检查点抑制剂的潜在联合应用。