Suppr超能文献

肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼和度伐利尤单抗对比标准一线治疗吉西他滨和顺铂加度伐利尤单抗治疗晚期肝内胆管癌

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with lenvatinib and durvalumab versus standard first-line treatment gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

作者信息

Zhao Rongce, Zhou Jing, Xiong Xinhao, Wang Qiaoxuan, Liu Chunxiao, Wei Wei, Li Shaohua, Guo Rongping

机构信息

Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.

Department of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):4922-4934. doi: 10.62347/HVOF5644. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory despite the recommended first-line treatment of gemcitabine with cisplatin and durvalumab (GCD). We recently reported that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and durvalumab (HLD) exhibited promising antitumor activity and manageable adverse events in patients with unresectable ICC. Here, we aimed to compare HLD with GCD in patients with advanced ICC. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with advanced ICC administered HLD or GCD between January 2020 and March 2024. Safety and patient outcomes, including overall and progression-free survival and objective response rate, were compared between the two groups. The study cohort included 31 and 28 patients in the HLD and GCD groups, respectively. Compared to the GCD group, the HLD group experienced significantly better overall survival (median, 15.8 vs. 9.6 months; = 0.033), longer progression-free survival (median, 10.3 vs. 4.1 months; = 0.007), and a higher objective response rate (46.2% vs. 13.1%; = 0.009). By subgroup analysis, patients with single tumor, intrahepatic tumors >5 cm, or unilobar tumors benefited more from HLD treatment. Additionally, the rates of any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 92.9%, = 0.221; 32.3% vs. 42.9%, = 0.401; respectively). In conclusion, HLD treatment was tolerable and associated with better survival benefits compared to the standard first-line GCD treatment in patients with advanced ICC, especially in those with single tumor, intrahepatic tumors >5 cm, and unilobar tumors.

摘要

在晚期肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者中,尽管推荐使用吉西他滨联合顺铂和度伐利尤单抗(GCD)作为一线治疗方案,但临床疗效仍不尽人意。我们最近报告称,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合乐伐替尼和度伐利尤单抗(HLD)在不可切除的ICC患者中显示出有前景的抗肿瘤活性且不良事件可控。在此,我们旨在比较HLD与GCD在晚期ICC患者中的疗效。这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2024年3月期间连续接受HLD或GCD治疗的晚期ICC患者。比较了两组的安全性和患者预后,包括总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率。研究队列中,HLD组和GCD组分别有31例和28例患者。与GCD组相比,HLD组的总生存期显著更长(中位数分别为15.8个月和9.6个月;P = 0.033),无进展生存期更长(中位数分别为10.3个月和4.1个月;P = 0.007),客观缓解率更高(46.2% vs. 13.1%;P = 0.009)。通过亚组分析,单发肿瘤、肝内肿瘤>5 cm或单叶肿瘤的患者从HLD治疗中获益更多。此外,两组任何级别的不良事件发生率和3 - 4级不良事件发生率均无显著差异(分别为100% vs. 92.9%,P = 0.221;32.3% vs. 42.9%,P = 0.401)。总之,在晚期ICC患者中,与标准一线GCD治疗相比,HLD治疗耐受性良好且生存获益更佳,尤其是在单发肿瘤、肝内肿瘤>5 cm和单叶肿瘤的患者中。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
How to incorporate new agents into precise medicine for cholangiocarcinoma?
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 May 15;14(5):2570-2583. doi: 10.62347/NFDL2398. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验