Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者斋月禁食期间血糖风险指数及连续血糖监测指标的改善:一项真实世界观察性研究

Improvement of Glycemia Risk Index and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics During Ramadan Fasting in Type 1 Diabetes: A Real-World Observational Study.

作者信息

Al Hayek Ayman, Al Dawish Mohamed A

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Diabetes Treatment Center, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 29:19322968241301750. doi: 10.1177/19322968241301750.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Managing glycemia during Ramadan is challenging for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) due to prolonged fasting and altered eating patterns. While many are exempt from fasting, some choose to fast, necessitating careful monitoring. The glycemia risk index (GRI) is valuable for assessing glycemic quality and interpreting continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to identify individuals needing closer clinical attention. This study investigates the effects of Ramadan fasting on glycemic control in T1D, focusing on GRI and its components for hypoglycemia (CHypo) and hyperglycemia (CHyper).

METHOD

An ambispective study involved 186 individuals with T1D using intermittent scanning CGM (isCGM). Data were retrospectively collected for one month before Ramadan and prospectively during and one month after Ramadan. Clinical, metabolic, and glycemic data were collected, with GRI calculated alongside its components.

RESULTS

During Ramadan, GRI improved by 54.6% (from 56.4 to 25.6), CHypo decreased by 60% (from 6 to 2.4), and CHyper dropped by 40.5% (from 21 to 12.5). However, these benefits were temporary, as glycemic measures increased after Ramadan, reflecting a return to pre-Ramadan patterns once normal routines resumed. No participants were admitted for diabetes emergencies during Ramadan. Adolescents and patients on insulin pumps had more favorable outcomes. GRI and its components significantly correlated with other CGM metrics, with these relationships maintained during and after Ramadan.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramadan fasting significantly improved GRI and its components in individuals with T1D. Incorporating GRI as a novel metric alongside classical CGM metrics could enhance glycemic control, highlighting the need for personalized diabetes management strategies.

摘要

背景

斋月期间,由于禁食时间延长和饮食模式改变,1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的血糖管理颇具挑战。虽然许多人可免于禁食,但仍有部分人选择禁食,因此需要密切监测。血糖风险指数(GRI)对于评估血糖质量和解读持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)数据以确定需要更密切临床关注的个体很有价值。本研究调查斋月禁食对T1D患者血糖控制的影响,重点关注GRI及其低血糖(CHypo)和高血糖(CHyper)成分。

方法

一项前瞻性研究纳入了186名使用间歇性扫描CGM(isCGM)的T1D患者。回顾性收集斋月前一个月的数据,并前瞻性收集斋月期间及斋月后一个月的数据。收集临床、代谢和血糖数据,并计算GRI及其成分。

结果

斋月期间,GRI改善了54.6%(从56.4降至25.6),CHypo下降了60%(从6降至2.4),CHyper下降了40.5%(从21降至12.5)。然而,这些益处是暂时的,因为斋月后血糖指标有所上升,这反映出一旦恢复正常日常活动,血糖水平就会回到斋月前的模式。斋月期间没有参与者因糖尿病紧急情况入院。青少年和使用胰岛素泵的患者的结果更理想。GRI及其成分与其他CGM指标显著相关,且这些关系在斋月期间及斋月后均保持不变。

结论

斋月禁食显著改善了T1D患者的GRI及其成分。将GRI作为一种新的指标与传统CGM指标相结合,可以加强血糖控制,凸显了个性化糖尿病管理策略的必要性。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of glycemia risk index and continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in type 1 diabetes: a real-world observational study.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Feb 1;24(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01569-w. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Impact of glucose variability on the assessment of the glycemia risk index (GRI) and classic glycemic metrics.
Endocrine. 2023 Dec;82(3):560-568. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03511-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis Using the Glycemia Risk Index.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):764-770. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231307. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
9
A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1226-1242. doi: 10.1177/19322968221085273. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Glycemia Risk Index Predicts Performance of Diabetes Self-Management Habits in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):779-786. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247215. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis Using the Glycemia Risk Index.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):764-770. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231307. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Glycemic variability: Measurement, target, impact on complications of diabetes and does it really matter?
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Jan;15(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14112. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Glycaemia risk index uncovers distinct glycaemic variability patterns associated with remission status in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetologia. 2024 Jan;67(1):42-51. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06042-y. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Impact of glucose variability on the assessment of the glycemia risk index (GRI) and classic glycemic metrics.
Endocrine. 2023 Dec;82(3):560-568. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03511-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
Comparison of Glycemia Risk Index with Time in Range for Assessing Glycemic Quality.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Dec;25(12):883-892. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0264. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
Efficacy of Fasting in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 10;15(16):3525. doi: 10.3390/nu15163525.
8
Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in the Hospital: The Diabetes Technology Society Hospital Meeting Report 2023.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1392-1418. doi: 10.1177/19322968231186575. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
10
Glycemic Risk Index Profiles and Predictors Among Diverse Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1070-1078. doi: 10.1177/19322968231164151. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验