Imprecision nutrition? Intraindividual variability of glucose responses to duplicate presented meals in adults without diabetes.

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are used to characterize postprandial glucose responses and provide personalized dietary advice to minimize glucose excursions. The efficacy of such advice depends on reliable glucose responses.

OBJECTIVES

To explore within-subject variability of CGM responses to duplicate presented meals in an inpatient setting.

METHODS

CGM data were collected from two inpatient feeding studies in 30 participants without diabetes, capturing 1189 responses to duplicate meals presented ∼1 wk apart from four dietary patterns. One study used two different CGMs (Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro and Dexcom G4 Platinum) whereas the other study used only Dexcom. We calculated the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose for each 2-h postmeal period and compared within-subject, within-CGM responses to duplicate presented meals using linear correlations, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses. Individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals were also compared with different meals using standard deviations (SDs).

RESULTS

There were weak-to-moderate positive linear correlations between within-subject iAUCs for duplicate meals [Abbott r = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38, 0.54, P < 0.0001 and Dexcom r = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.50, P < 0.0001], with low within-participant reliability indicated by ICC (Abbott 0.28, Dexcom 0.17). Bland-Altman analyses indicated wide limits of agreement (LoA) (Abbott -29.8 to 28.4 mg/dL and Dexcom -29.4 to 32.1 mg/dL) but small bias of mean iAUCs for duplicate meals (Abbott -0.7 mg/dL and Dexcom 1.3 mg/dL). The individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals was similar to that of different meals evaluated each diet week for both Abbott [SD 11.7 mg/dL (compared with duplicate P = 0.01), SD 10.6 mg/dL (P = 0.43), and SD 10.1 mg/dL] and Dexcom [SD 10.9 mg/dL (P = 0.62), SD 11.0 mg/dL (P = 0.73), and SD 11.2 mg/dL].

CONCLUSIONS

Individual postprandial CGM responses to duplicate meals were highly variable in adults without diabetes. Personalized diet advice on the basis of CGM measurements requires more reliable methods involving aggregated repeated measurements. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03407053 and NCT03878108.