O'Connor Patrick J, Haapala Jacob L, Dehmer Steven P, Chumba Lilian N, Ekstrom Heidi L, Asche Stephen E, Rehrauer Dan J, Pankonin Melissa A, Pawloski Pamala A, Raebel Marsha, Sperl-Hillen JoAnn M
HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota.
HealthPartners, Bloomington, Minnesota.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53745.
Medication adherence is important for managing blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Interventions to improve medication adherence are needed.
To examine the effectiveness of an intervention using algorithmic identification of low medication adherence, clinical decision support to physicians, and pharmacist outreach to patients to improve cardiometabolic medication adherence and BP, LDL-C, and HbA1c control.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 2-arm, patient-randomized, parallel group clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-six primary care clinics using effective decision support to encourage timely adjustments of cardiometabolic medications were included. On the date of an index visit, participants were (1) aged 18 to 75 years, (2) receiving a statin or not at the goal level for HbA1c or BP, and (3) had proportion of days covered less than 80% for 1 or more BP or noninsulin glucose-lowering medications or a statin. The study was conducted from August 19, 2020, to September 30, 2023. Data analysis was performed from October 1, 2023, to August 30, 2024.
Electronic health record-linked clinical decision support identified and encouraged discussion of medication adherence issues. For patients in the intervention cohort continuing to meet eligibility criteria 6 months after an index visit, pharmacist telephone outreach was attempted.
The main outcomes of the trial were (1) adherence to selected classes of cardiometabolic medications, (2) control of HbA1c, BP, or LDL-C levels at 12 months after the index visit, and (3) costs of care.
Among 5421 participants (2990 [55%] male; mean [SD] age, 57 [11] years) 12 months after the index date, intervention patients had better adherence to BP medications (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06-1.56), but no better adherence to statins (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99-1.41) or noninsulin diabetes medications (AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.30) compared with patients receiving usual care. The intervention did not improve mean HbA1c (-0.2%; 95% CI, -0.4 to 0.1), systolic BP (1.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -0.8 to 3.5 mm Hg), or LDL-C (-1.8 mg/dL; 95% CI, -6.5 to 2.8 mg/dL). Compared with usual care, intervention patients eligible for pharmacist outreach had improved HbA1c (-0.4%; 95% CI, -0.8% to -0.1%) compared with those not eligible for outreach (-0.0; 95% CI, -0.3% to 0.3%). Health care use costs did not differ significantly between study arms.
This cost-neutral intervention increased adherence to BP medications, but not to statins or glucose-lowering medications, with no overall improvement in BP, LDL-C, or HbA1c control. Modifications of this intervention strategy are needed to improve cardiometabolic risk factor control.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03748420.
药物依从性对于控制血压(BP)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)至关重要。需要采取干预措施来提高药物依从性。
研究一种干预措施的有效性,该措施包括通过算法识别低药物依从性、为医生提供临床决策支持以及药剂师对患者进行随访,以提高心血管代谢药物依从性以及血压、LDL-C和HbA1c的控制水平。
设计、地点和参与者:进行了一项双臂、患者随机、平行组临床试验。纳入了26家使用有效决策支持以鼓励及时调整心血管代谢药物的初级保健诊所。在索引就诊日期,参与者需满足以下条件:(1)年龄在18至75岁之间;(2)正在接受他汀类药物治疗或HbA1c或血压未达到目标水平;(3)一种或多种降压药或非胰岛素降糖药或他汀类药物的覆盖天数比例低于80%。该研究于2020年8月19日至2023年9月30日进行。数据分析于2023年10月1日至2024年8月30日进行。
与电子健康记录相关联的临床决策支持识别并鼓励讨论药物依从性问题。对于索引就诊后6个月仍符合资格标准的干预队列中的患者,尝试进行药剂师电话随访。
试验的主要结局为:(1)对选定类别的心血管代谢药物的依从性;(2)索引就诊后12个月时HbA1c、血压或LDL-C水平的控制情况;(3)护理成本。
在索引日期后的12个月,5421名参与者(2990名[55%]男性;平均[标准差]年龄为57[11]岁)中,与接受常规护理的患者相比,干预组患者对降压药的依从性更好(调整后的优势比[AOR]为1.29;95%置信区间为1.06 - 1.56),但对他汀类药物(AOR为1.18;95%置信区间为0.99 - 1.41)或非胰岛素糖尿病药物(AOR为1.03;95%置信区间为0.82 - 1.30)的依从性并无改善。该干预措施并未改善平均HbA1c(-0.2%;95%置信区间为-0.4至0.1)、收缩压(1.4毫米汞柱;95%置信区间为-0.8至3.5毫米汞柱)或LDL-C(-1.8毫克/分升;95%置信区间为-6.5至2.8毫克/分升)。与常规护理相比,有资格接受药剂师随访的干预组患者的HbA1c有所改善(-0.4%;95%置信区间为-0.8%至-0.1%),而无资格接受随访的患者HbA1c无变化(-0.0;95%置信区间为-0.3%至0.3%)。研究组之间的医疗保健使用成本无显著差异。
这种成本中性的干预措施提高了对降压药的依从性,但对他汀类药物或降糖药物的依从性未提高,且在血压、LDL-C或HbA1c控制方面未取得总体改善。需要对该干预策略进行调整以改善心血管代谢危险因素的控制。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03748420。