Battaglia Simone, Servajean Philippe, Friston Karl J
Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Laboratoire Epsylon EA 4556, Université Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France.
Phys Life Rev. 2025 Mar;52:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
The paradox of a brain trying to study itself presents a conundrum, raising questions about self-reference, consciousness, psychiatric disorders, and the boundaries of scientific inquiry. By which means can this complex organ shift the focus of study towards itself? We aim at unpacking the intricacies of this paradox. Historically, this question has been raised by philosophers under different frameworks. Thanks to the development of novel techniques to study the brain on a functional and structural level - as well as neurostimulation protocols that can modulate its activity in selected areas - we now possess advanced methods to progress this intricate inquiry. Nonetheless, the broader implications of the brain's pursuit of understanding itself remain unclear to this day. Ultimately, the need to employ both perception and introspection has led to different formulations of consciousness. This creates a challenge, as evidence supporting one formulation does not necessarily support the other. By deconstructing the paradoxical nature of self understanding - from a philosophical and neuroscientific point of view - we may gain insights into the human brain, which could lead to improved understanding of self-awareness and consciousness.
大脑试图研究自身这一悖论带来了一个难题,引发了关于自我指涉、意识、精神疾病以及科学探究边界的问题。这个复杂的器官通过何种方式能够将研究重点转向自身呢?我们旨在剖析这一悖论的复杂性。从历史角度来看,不同框架下的哲学家们都曾提出过这个问题。得益于在功能和结构层面研究大脑的新技术的发展——以及能够调节特定区域大脑活动的神经刺激方案——我们如今拥有了推进这一复杂探究的先进方法。尽管如此,大脑追求自我理解的更广泛影响至今仍不明晰。最终,运用感知和内省的需求导致了对意识的不同表述。这带来了一个挑战,因为支持一种表述的证据不一定支持另一种表述。从哲学和神经科学的角度解构自我理解的悖论本质,我们或许能够深入了解人类大脑,这可能会增进对自我意识和意识的理解。