Suppr超能文献

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对近期与既往心肌梗死患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Impact of sodium‒glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with recent versus previous myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Scardini Pedro Gabriel, Shih Katsuyama Eric, Armani Prata Alonzo, Marques Fernandes Julia, Ken Fukunaga Christian, Falco Neto Wilson, Covre Coan Ana Carolina, Machado de Andrade Naieli, Santana Silva Abraão, Petri Pinheiro Rafael, Gioli Pereira Luciana, Furtado Remo H M

机构信息

Higher School of Sciences of the Holy House of Mercy of Vitória, Av. Nossa Sra. da Penha, 2190 - Santa Luíza, Vitória, ES, 29045-402, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, FMABC University Centre, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 13;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02540-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium‒glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been included in heart failure (HF) guidelines because of their benefits in reducing mortality and hospitalization rates. However, the timing and benefits of initiating SGLT2 inhibitors in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo in patients with MI.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with recent or previous MI. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for RCTs comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with MI. The primary outcome was (1) HF hospitalization. In this analysis, we also included the following secondary outcomes: (2) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke; and (3) all-cause mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted for the primary outcome, comparing patients who had experienced an MI more than 8 weeks prior to study enrolment (previous MI) versus those who had experienced an MI within the preceding 8 weeks (acute MI). Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs comprising 22,266 patients, of whom 11,339 (51.2%) had type 2 diabetes. The mean age was 62 years, and the median follow-up was 21 months. According to the pooled analysis, HF hospitalization rates were lower in patients on SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69, 0.85; p < 0.001)). Differences in MACE were also observed in favor of SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79, 0.97; p = 0.012). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between the groups (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78, 1.00; p = 0.058). Benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for the primary outcome were consistent regardless of the timing of last MI, with no treatment by subgroup interaction (p for interaction = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of patients who experienced MI, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower rates of hospitalization for HF. In addition, the treatment effect of SGLT2 inhibitors was consistent regardless of whether they were started in the recent versus previous MI setting.

摘要

背景

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂已被纳入心力衰竭(HF)指南,因为它们在降低死亡率和住院率方面具有益处。然而,心肌梗死(MI)患者启动SGLT2抑制剂的时机和益处仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较SGLT2抑制剂与安慰剂在MI患者中的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定SGLT2抑制剂对近期或既往有MI患者的影响。我们系统检索了PubMed、Cochrane和Embase,查找比较SGLT2抑制剂与安慰剂治疗MI患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为:(1)HF住院。在该分析中,我们还纳入了以下次要结局:(2)主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为心血管(CV)死亡、MI或卒中的复合事件;以及(3)全因死亡率。对主要结局进行亚组分析,比较入组前MI超过8周的患者(既往MI)与入组前8周内发生MI的患者(急性MI)。采用随机效应模型汇总风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

我们的荟萃分析纳入了10项RCT,共22266例患者,其中11339例(51.2%)患有2型糖尿病。平均年龄为62岁,中位随访时间为21个月。根据汇总分析,与安慰剂相比,SGLT2抑制剂治疗的患者HF住院率更低(RR 0.77;95%CI 0.69,0.85;p<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2抑制剂在MACE方面也观察到差异(RR 0.88;95%CI 0.79,0.97;p = 0.012)。两组间全因死亡率无统计学显著差异(RR 0.88;95%CI 0.78,1.00;p = 0.058)。无论上次MI的时间如何,SGLT2抑制剂对主要结局的益处都是一致的,亚组间无治疗交互作用(交互作用p = 0.56)。

结论

在这项对MI患者的荟萃分析中,SGLT2抑制剂的使用与较低的HF住院率相关。此外,无论SGLT2抑制剂是在近期MI还是既往MI背景下开始使用,其治疗效果都是一致的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb0/11827181/b93a0874a5f8/12933_2024_2540_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验