Khavandegar Armin, Ahmadi Negar Sadat, Mousavi Maryam Alsadat, Ramezani Zahra, Khodadoust Elaheh, Hasan Zadeh Tabatabaei Mahgol Sadat, Hasanpour Segherlou Zahra, Zeinaddini-Meymand Arman, Nasehi Fatemeh, Moafi Maral, RayatSanati Kimia, Masoomi Rasool, Hamidi Sorour, Pourkhodadad Soheila, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Spinal Cord. 2025 Mar;63(3):95-126. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01064-2. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
Systematic Review.
To thoroughly assess the existing literature regarding the impact of anti-RhoA/ROCK agents or procedures on functional recovery in animal models of SCI.
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
A comprehensive search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection utilizing a combination of keywords. All in-vivo animal studies of acute or chronic SCI that evaluated the pharmacological effects of Rho/ROCK inhibitors in English literature were included in this study.
Totally, 2320 articles were identified, of which, 60 papers were included for further analysis. A total of 47 (78%) studies were conducted merely on rats, 9 (15%) on mice, 3 (5%) used both, and the remaining used other animals. Y-27632, Fasudil, C3 Transferase and its derivatives (C-05/PEP-C/CT04/Cbot154-182/Cbot26mer(156-181)), Ibuprofen, Electroacupuncture (EA), SiRhoA, miR-133b, miR-135-5p, miR-381, miR-30b, Statins, 17β-estradiol, β-elemene, Lentivirus-mediated PGC-1a, Repulsive guidance molecule (RGMa), Local profound hypothermia, Jisuikang (JSK), Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), Lv-shRhoA (Notch-1 inhibitor), Anti-Ryk antibody, LINGO-antagonist, BA-210, p21Cip1/WAF1, ORL-1 antagonist, Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), Tamsulosin, AAV.ULK1.DN, and Indomethacin were the 28 reported agents/procedures with anti-RhoA/ROCK effects. The pooled SMD for BBB scores was 0.41 (p = 0.048) in the first week, 0.85 (p < 0.001) in the second week, 1.22 (p = 0.010) in the third week, and 1.53 (p = 0.001) in the fourth week.
Of the 28 identified anti-RhoA/ROCK agents, all but two (Cbot and its derivatives and EGCG) demonstrated promising results. The results of the meta-analysis cautiously indicate a significant increase in BBB scores over time after SCI.
系统评价。
全面评估现有文献中抗RhoA/ROCK药物或方法对脊髓损伤动物模型功能恢复的影响。
德黑兰医科大学新浪创伤与外科研究中心。
利用关键词组合在Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和科学引文索引核心合集进行全面检索。本研究纳入了所有评估Rho/ROCK抑制剂药理作用的急性或慢性脊髓损伤体内动物研究,且这些研究发表于英文文献。
共识别出2320篇文章,其中60篇纳入进一步分析。总共47项(78%)研究仅在大鼠上进行,9项(15%)在小鼠上进行,3项(5%)同时使用大鼠和小鼠,其余研究使用其他动物。Y-27632、法舒地尔、C3转移酶及其衍生物(C-05/PEP-C/CT04/Cbot154-182/Cbot26mer(156-181))、布洛芬、电针(EA)、SiRhoA、miR-133b、miR-135-5p、miR-381、miR-30b、他汀类药物、17β-雌二醇、β-榄香烯、慢病毒介导的PGC-1a、排斥导向分子(RGMa)、局部深度低温、芪麝丸(JSK)、高压氧(HBO)、Lv-shRhoA(Notch-1抑制剂)、抗Ryk抗体、LINGO拮抗剂、BA-210、p21Cip1/WAF1、ORL-1拮抗剂、表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯(EGCG)、坦索罗辛、AAV.ULK1.DN和吲哚美辛是报道的28种具有抗RhoA/ROCK作用的药物/方法。BBB评分的合并标准化均数差在第一周为0.41(p = 0.048),第二周为0.85(p < 0.001),第三周为1.22(p = 0.010),第四周为1.53(p = 0.001)。
在已识别的28种抗RhoA/ROCK药物中,除两种(Cbot及其衍生物和EGCG)外,其余均显示出有前景的结果。荟萃分析结果谨慎表明,脊髓损伤后随着时间推移BBB评分显著增加。