Nunes Ana Raquel, Karaba Florence, Geddes Olivia, Bickerton Abi, Atherton Helen, Dahlmann Frederik, Eccles Abi, Gregg Michael, Spencer Rachel, Twohig Helen, Dale Jeremy
University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 19;15(2):e091404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091404.
To summarise and synthesise existing literature on the implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice, to outline the actions being implemented, factors influencing decarbonisation, identify evidence gaps and questions for future research.
A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and ProQuest (grey literature) were searched for literature published up to 29 March 2024.
Studies of any design investigating the implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice.
Two reviewers extracted data and conducted quality assessments using a mixed methods appraisal tool. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.
Fifteen studies were included. Studies were primarily from the UK (n=5), followed by Australia (n=3), USA (n=2), Germany (n=2) and one each from France, Switzerland and Israel. Study designs were qualitative (n=7), quantitative (n=7) and one mixed methods. Participants included healthcare staff (n=7), patients (n=5), health stakeholders (n=2) and the general public (n=1). There was evidence of general practices adopting decarbonisation actions such as resource reuse, improved waste management, energy-efficient systems and preventive care to reduce overmedication, with strong leadership and institutional support being crucial for their success. However, barriers such as high costs, resource constraints and limited awareness among clinicians and patients highlighted the need for enhanced communication, education and the structured promotion of initiatives to improve patient and community engagement.
There is limited evidence on the implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice. A range of factors may impact on the extent to which implementation occurs. Addressing these will be crucial for effectively promoting and scaling decarbonisation actions in general practice. Future research should focus on understanding the role of institutional context, evaluating the real-world impact of interventions on greenhouse gas emissions and exploring patient and community involvement.
CRD42023470889.
总结和综合现有关于在全科医疗中实施脱碳行动的文献,概述正在实施的行动、影响脱碳的因素,识别证据空白以及未来研究的问题。
系统评价和叙述性综合分析。
检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science和ProQuest(灰色文献),以获取截至2024年3月29日发表的文献。
任何设计的研究,调查在全科医疗中实施脱碳行动的情况。
两名评审员使用混合方法评估工具提取数据并进行质量评估。采用叙述性综合分析来分析研究结果。
纳入了15项研究。研究主要来自英国(n = 5),其次是澳大利亚(n = 3)、美国(n = 2)、德国(n = 2),法国、瑞士和以色列各有1项。研究设计包括定性研究(n = 7)、定量研究(n = 7)和1项混合方法研究。参与者包括医护人员(n = 7)、患者(n = 5)、卫生利益相关者(n = 2)和普通公众(n = 1)。有证据表明,全科医疗正在采取脱碳行动,如资源再利用、改善废物管理、节能系统以及预防过度用药的预防性护理,强有力的领导和机构支持对其成功至关重要。然而,高成本、资源限制以及临床医生和患者意识有限等障碍凸显了加强沟通、教育以及有组织地推广相关举措以提高患者和社区参与度的必要性。
关于全科医疗中脱碳行动实施情况的证据有限。一系列因素可能会影响实施的程度。解决这些问题对于在全科医疗中有效推广和扩大脱碳行动至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于理解机构背景的作用、评估干预措施对温室气体排放的实际影响以及探索患者和社区的参与情况。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023470889。