Stepney Melissa, Martin Samantha, Mikulak Magdalena, Ryan Sara, Stewart Jay, Ma Richard, Barnett Adam
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(4):1-130. doi: 10.3310/XCYT6530.
In the United Kingdom, trans young people find themselves at the centre of political storms and debate regarding their access to health care and treatment. This research was carried out against a backdrop of increasing evidence of repeated failings in health care for trans people. Compounding this, trans young people face lengthy waiting lists when seeking specialist gender services and problems with the referral process. In order to cope and thrive, online resources and spaces have become increasingly important for trans young people. Finding good-quality resources and information can be difficult for young people and families.
Our aim was to improve the care and support of gender-diverse youth, and their families, through identifying improvements to National Health Service care and services. Within this overall aim, our objectives were to gain a better understanding of the experiences of trans youth, family members and health professionals; and to develop and evaluate sections of the Healthtalk website on young people and parent/carer experiences.
The primary method of data collection was qualitative in-depth interviews conducted between 2019 and 2021. In total, 91 interviews were conducted with 50 young people (42 aged 13-24 years and 10 aged 25-35 years), 19 family members (parents/carers) and 20 health professionals working with trans patients. We evaluated the resources with young people and families who have experience of being on the waiting list for specialist gender services.
From interviews with health professionals, we identified four key domains that prevent trans and gender-diverse young people receiving good-quality care. These were structural, educational, cultural and social, and technical barriers. Parents/carers' healthcare experiences were marked by multiple challenges. These occurred at all stages of the pathway and range from getting a referral to specialist gender services, lack of support during waiting times through to sometimes unclear and lengthy assessment processes, which many experience as gatekeeping of gender-affirming care. The majority of the young people in our sample felt the current healthcare system does not cater for the diversity of trans identities and needs. A linear, one-dimensional, conception of gender identity informs services. This is restrictive and does not reflect the plurality and fluidity of experiences. Young people we spoke with generally perceived National Health Service services as built around a culture of pathologisation, gatekeeping and trans hostility, resulting in a general level of mistrust. The research supported the development of two sections of the Healthtalk website concerning young people and parent/carer experiences.
We make five recommendations: (1) better and empowered decision-making for trans young people; (2) recognising and catering for gender diversity in health care; (3) a 'systems change' intervention approach that goes beyond training for individual health practitioners; (4) a restructured service based upon informed consent; and (5) a positive role for the National Health Service in public debate, challenging misinformation. These findings have wider applicability to other settings/services such as education and social work.
This research was not a service evaluation and did not evaluate current practice in Gender Identity Development Service or Gender Identity Clinics. The research was conducted in a rapidly changing field where specialist gender services for children and adolescents are undergoing significant changes based on the Cass review recommendations, which might render some service-specific information out of date.
An evaluation in partnership with trans organisations to assess the reorganisation of specialist services. Research on homeless trans youth, sibling and grandparent experiences, and trans youth in care/care leavers.
This study is registered on ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN26256441.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/51/07) and is published in full in ; Vol. 13, No. 4. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
在英国,跨性别青少年发现自己处于有关其获得医疗保健和治疗的政治风暴及辩论的中心。这项研究是在越来越多证据表明跨性别者的医疗保健屡屡出现问题的背景下进行的。更糟糕的是,跨性别青少年在寻求专科性别服务时面临漫长的等待名单以及转诊过程中的问题。为了应对并茁壮成长,在线资源和空间对跨性别青少年变得越来越重要。年轻人和家庭很难找到高质量的资源和信息。
我们的目标是通过确定对国民保健服务(NHS)护理和服务的改进措施,来改善对性别多样化青少年及其家庭的护理和支持。在这个总体目标范围内,我们的具体目标是更好地了解跨性别青少年、家庭成员和医疗专业人员的经历;并开发和评估Healthtalk网站上关于年轻人以及父母/照顾者经历的板块。
数据收集的主要方法是在2019年至2021年期间进行定性深入访谈。总共对50名年轻人(42名年龄在13 - 24岁之间,10名年龄在25 - 35岁之间)、19名家庭成员(父母/照顾者)以及20名为跨性别患者提供服务的医疗专业人员进行了91次访谈。我们与有专科性别服务等待名单经历的年轻人和家庭一起评估了这些资源。
通过对医疗专业人员的访谈,我们确定了阻碍跨性别和性别多样化青少年获得高质量护理的四个关键领域。这些是结构、教育、文化和社会以及技术障碍。父母/照顾者的医疗保健经历面临多重挑战。这些挑战出现在整个过程的各个阶段,从获得专科性别服务的转诊,等待期间缺乏支持,到有时不明确且漫长的评估过程,许多人将其视为性别肯定护理的把关。我们样本中的大多数年轻人认为当前的医疗保健系统没有满足跨性别身份和需求的多样性。对性别认同的线性、一维概念为服务提供了依据。这具有局限性,不能反映经历的多元性和流动性。与我们交谈的年轻人普遍认为国民保健服务是围绕病态化、把关和对跨性别者的敌意文化构建的,导致普遍的不信任。该研究支持了Healthtalk网站上关于年轻人以及父母/照顾者经历的两个板块的开发。
我们提出五项建议:(1)为跨性别青少年提供更好且更有权力的决策;(2)在医疗保健中认识并满足性别多样性;(3)一种超越对个体医疗从业者培训的“系统变革”干预方法;(4)基于知情同意的重组服务;(5)国民保健服务在公众辩论中发挥积极作用,挑战错误信息。这些发现对教育和社会工作等其他环境/服务具有更广泛的适用性。
这项研究不是服务评估,也没有评估性别认同发展服务或性别认同诊所的当前实践。该研究是在一个快速变化的领域进行的,根据卡斯审查建议,针对儿童和青少年的专科性别服务正在经历重大变革,这可能使一些特定于服务的信息过时。
与跨性别组织合作进行评估,以评估专科服务的重组。对无家可归的跨性别青少年、兄弟姐妹和祖父母的经历以及受照料/离开照料机构的跨性别青少年进行研究。
本研究在ISRCTN注册库注册,注册号为ISRCTN26256441。
本奖项由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会保健交付研究计划资助(NIHR奖项编号:17/51/07),并全文发表于《……》第13卷,第4期。有关进一步的奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资金与奖项网站。