Cinque Francesco, van den Tillaert Femke M, Yzer Suzanne, de Breuk Anita, Heesterbeek Tom J, Hoyng Carel B, Lechanteur Yara Te
Department of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525, The Netherlands.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06751-7.
To investigate the potential effect of anti-VEGF treatment on choroidal thickness (CT) in unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients.
This is a cross-sectional study where patients were included as part of an ongoing prospective study which included patients with unilateral neovascular (n) AMD. The fellow-eye served as control. All patients had spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with enhanced depth imaging (EDI) done at every visit. CT was measured independently by two graders at five locations: subfoveal, 1500 micron temporal and nasal, 3000 micron temporal and nasal. The average of the measurements was used after statistical verification of their accuracy. CT differences were initially analysed via a paired T-test and later via multiple linear regression. Variables such as number of injections were studied and presence of geographic atrophy (GA) in fellow-eyes was evaluated via SD-OCT.
A total of 112 patients met the inclusion criteria (Female 67%). The median (IQR) years of treatment was 2.6 (4.1). The subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in the neovascular (NV) eye appeared thinner in the NNV eye initially (-11.0 μm difference between NV and NNV SFCT (CI -23.4 to 1.3). However, after age-adjustment this trend disappeared (CI -29.8 to 4.6). In fact, apart from age (CI -6.2 to -0.1)), no other variable including number of anti-VEGF injections (CI -1.5 to 1.4) predicted SFCT. Presence of GA in fellow eyes did not influence the SFCT compared to non-GA fellow eyes, difference (CI -59.7 to 46.6).
This study shows no statistically significant CT difference in NV versus NNV eyes. There was no relationship between number of injections and CT.
What is known Intravitreal injection with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) is the mainstay treatment for exudation secondary to neovascular AMD. One quarter of anti-VEGF treated neovascular AMD patients will develop signs of macular atrophy within 2 years, possibly related to anti-VEGF treatment. What this study adds A hypothesized mechanism for atrophy induction is the effect of anti-VEGF on choroidal thickness. In this cross-sectional study, we found a non-significant 11 micron difference between anti-VEGF treated eyes and non-treated eyes in long-term follow-up neovascular AMD patients. A relationship between choroidal thinning and the number of anti-VEGF injections was furthermore not shown. How this study might affect research, practice or policy There is no significant choroidal thickness difference between anti-VEGF treated and non-treated long-term follow-up neovascular AMD. We therefore suggest that atrophy induction through choroidal thinning secondary to anti-VEGF injections is of limited concern.
研究抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗对单侧新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者脉络膜厚度(CT)的潜在影响。
这是一项横断面研究,患者作为正在进行的前瞻性研究的一部分被纳入,该前瞻性研究包括单侧新生血管性(n)AMD患者。对侧眼作为对照。所有患者每次就诊时均进行了具有增强深度成像(EDI)的光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)。CT由两名分级人员在五个位置独立测量:黄斑中心凹下、颞侧和鼻侧1500微米处、颞侧和鼻侧3000微米处。在对测量准确性进行统计验证后,使用测量值的平均值。CT差异最初通过配对t检验进行分析,随后通过多元线性回归进行分析。研究了诸如注射次数等变量,并通过SD-OCT评估对侧眼中地图样萎缩(GA)的存在情况。
共有112例患者符合纳入标准(女性占67%)。治疗的中位(四分位间距)年限为2.6(4.1)年。新生血管(NV)眼的黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)最初在患NV的眼中显得更薄(NV和非NV眼的SFCT之间相差-11.0μm(可信区间-23.4至1.3)。然而,在进行年龄调整后,这种趋势消失了(可信区间-29.8至4.6)。事实上,除了年龄(可信区间-6.2至-0.1))之外,没有其他变量包括抗VEGF注射次数(可信区间-1.5至1.4)能够预测SFCT。与无GA的对侧眼相比,对侧眼中GA的存在并不影响SFCT,差异为(可信区间-59.7至46.6)。
本研究显示患NV的眼与非NV的眼之间在CT上无统计学显著差异。注射次数与CT之间没有关系。
已知情况玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)是新生血管性AMD继发渗出的主要治疗方法。四分之一接受抗VEGF治疗的新生血管性AMD患者将在2年内出现黄斑萎缩迹象,这可能与抗VEGF治疗有关。本研究的补充内容一种关于萎缩诱导的假设机制是抗VEGF对脉络膜厚度的影响。在这项横断面研究中,我们发现在长期随访的新生血管性AMD患者中,接受抗VEGF治疗的眼与未治疗的眼之间存在11微米的差异,但无统计学意义。此外,未显示脉络膜变薄与抗VEGF注射次数之间存在关系。本研究可能对研究、实践或政策产生的影响在接受抗VEGF治疗和未治疗的长期随访新生血管性AMD患者之间,脉络膜厚度无显著差异。因此,我们认为抗VEGF注射继发脉络膜变薄导致萎缩诱导的问题值得关注的程度有限。