Yan Yuhao, Cheng Jiexia, Gao Jie, Liu Yanna, Tian Haijiang, Liu Yaquan, Zheng Xuehan, Wang Guangxuan, Yao Jingtai, Ding Yun, Liu Aifeng, Wang Minghao, Zhao Jing, Wang Shunhao, Shi Chunzhen, Zeng Li, Yang Xinyue, Qin Hua, Zhao Xiulan, Liu Runzeng, Chen Liqun, Qu Guangbo, Yan Bing, Jiang Guibin
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Apr 1;59(12):5897-5912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c14716. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
Biodegradable plastics (BPs) are promoted as eco-friendly alternatives to conventional plastics. However, compared to conventional microplastics (MPs), they degrade rapidly into biodegradable microplastics (BMPs), which may lead to a more significant accumulation of BMPs in the environment. This review systematically compares BMPs and MPs, summarizes current knowledge on their environmental behaviors and impacts on ecosystems and human health, and offers recommendations for future research. BMPs are detected in water, sediments, indoor dust, food, marine organisms, and human samples. Compared to MPs, BMPs are more prone to environmental transformations, such as photodegradation and biodegradation, which results in a shorter migration distance across different matrices. Like MPs, BMPs can adsorb pollutants and transport them into organisms, enhancing toxicity and health risks through the Trojan horse effect. Studies indicate that BMPs may negatively impact terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems more than MPs by disrupting nutrient cycling and inhibiting plant and animal growth. and research also shows that BMP degradation products increase bioavailability, exacerbating neurotoxicity and overall toxicity. However, findings on BMPs' environmental and health effects remain inconsistent. Further evaluation of the trade-offs between BMP risks and their biodegradability is needed to address these uncertainties.
可生物降解塑料(BPs)被推崇为传统塑料的环保替代品。然而,与传统微塑料(MPs)相比,它们会迅速降解为可生物降解微塑料(BMPs),这可能导致环境中BMPs的积累更为显著。本综述系统地比较了BMPs和MPs,总结了目前关于它们的环境行为以及对生态系统和人类健康影响的知识,并为未来研究提供了建议。在水、沉积物、室内灰尘、食物、海洋生物和人类样本中都检测到了BMPs。与MPs相比,BMPs更容易发生环境转化,如光降解和生物降解,这导致其在不同基质间的迁移距离更短。与MPs一样,BMPs也能吸附污染物并将其传输到生物体中,通过“特洛伊木马”效应增强毒性和健康风险。研究表明,BMPs可能比MPs对陆地和水生生态系统产生更负面的影响,因为它们会扰乱养分循环并抑制动植物生长。 研究还表明,BMP降解产物会增加生物利用度,加剧神经毒性和整体毒性。然而,关于BMPs对环境和健康影响的研究结果仍然不一致。需要进一步评估BMP风险与其生物降解性之间的权衡,以解决这些不确定性。