Ma Xuying, Morawska Lidia, Zou Bin, Gao Jay, Deng Jun, Wang Xiaoqi, Wu Haojie, Xu Xin, Wang Yifan, Tan Zelei, Jiang Ningbo, Shen Yunzhong, Li Danyang, Gao Jun, Fan Yuanyuan, Salmond Jennifer
College of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China; College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China; International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia.
International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia.
Environ Int. 2025 Apr;198:109378. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109378. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) released new Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) which significantly reduced the recommended annual mean concentration of fine particulate matter (PM) in ambient air from 10 μg/m (AQG 2005) to 5 μg/m (AQG 2021). Recent studies have shown that this challenging new target may be close to or even below the background levels of PM resulting from non-anthropogenic activities in many regions globally, such as areas affected by desert dust. This raises an important question: can countries achieve compliance with the new guideline for PM? Here we investigated this question from the perspective of two countries that fall on opposite ends of the spectrum of ambient air pollution. We examined historical PM trends based on observations of annual mean PM concentrations from 2013 to 2024 in eight capital cities of each state in Australia and 31 capital cities of each province in mainland China. A statistical model was used to differentiate the contributions of meteorological variations and anthropogenic drivers to determining the annual trends of PM concentrations. Subsequently, we analyzed and discussed the feasibility of meeting the guidelines for each city based on these results. Our findings demonstrate that compliance with the new guideline is largely achievable, or has the potential to be achieved, in more than half of the cities in Australia. Notably, there is a high probability that a city, after meeting the guideline, may return to the non-compliance again. In addition, in some cities, eliminating anthropogenic emissions may not lead to a significant further reduction in PM concentrations, and they might not achieve compliance. In contrast, PM concentrations are an order of magnitude higher in some cities in China, yet Lhasa holds the potential to become the first Chinese city to meet the guideline in the future. Meeting the new AQG is highly challenging for Chinese cities, and even if achievable, it will take a long time. However, it is certain that China still has significant potential for further reductions in PM concentrations. This can be achieved through the ongoing implementation of emission control measures and the transition to the use of new sources of energy to reduce anthropogenic emissions. This study provides insights into the development of city-specific policies for air pollution control and management in both Australia and China.
2021年,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了新的空气质量指南(AQG),该指南大幅降低了对环境空气中细颗粒物(PM)的年平均浓度建议值,从10μg/m³(2005年AQG)降至5μg/m³(2021年AQG)。最近的研究表明,这个具有挑战性的新目标可能接近甚至低于全球许多地区非人为活动产生的PM背景水平,比如受沙尘影响的地区。这就引出了一个重要问题:各国能否实现对PM新指南的合规?在此,我们从处于环境空气污染频谱两端的两个国家的角度来研究这个问题。我们基于对澳大利亚每个州8个首府城市以及中国内地每个省份31个省会城市2013年至2024年年平均PM浓度的观测,研究了历史PM趋势。使用统计模型来区分气象变化和人为驱动因素对确定PM浓度年趋势的贡献。随后,我们根据这些结果分析并讨论了每个城市达到指南要求的可行性。我们的研究结果表明,在澳大利亚超过一半的城市中,很大程度上可以实现或有潜力实现对新指南的合规。值得注意的是,一个城市在达到指南要求后,很有可能再次回到不合规状态。此外,在一些城市,消除人为排放可能不会导致PM浓度进一步显著降低,它们可能无法实现合规。相比之下,中国一些城市的PM浓度要高出一个数量级,但拉萨有潜力成为未来首个达到指南要求的中国城市。对中国城市来说,达到新的AQG极具挑战性,即便能够实现,也需要很长时间。然而,可以肯定的是,中国在进一步降低PM浓度方面仍有巨大潜力。这可以通过持续实施排放控制措施以及向使用新能源转型以减少人为排放来实现。本研究为澳大利亚和中国制定针对空气污染控制与管理的城市特定政策提供了见解。