Akazili James, Amenah Michel Adurayi, Chola Lumbwe, Ayanore Martin Amogre, Ataguba John Ele-Ojo
School of Public Health, C K Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, Ghana.
Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 25;10(3):e018141. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018141.
Ghana implemented several health reforms in the 1970s and 1990s. Still, several access barriers persist, including high out-of-pocket (OOP) spending, which led to the implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in 2003 to achieve Universal Health Coverage and lower OOP spending. This study evaluates the incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among Ghanaian households post-NHIS, considering OOP health spending on different health services.
Data came from the Ghana Living Standards Surveys rounds 6 (2012/2013) and 7 (2016/2017) and the Annual Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2022/2023. Key variables were OOP spending on three health service categories (medical products, outpatient and inpatient) and total expenditure. The incidence and intensity of CHE for various health service categories were calculated using service-specific thresholds. A household incurs CHE for each service when OOP health spending as a share of total expenditure exceeds the service-specific threshold.
Overall, at the 10% threshold, CHE headcount for total OOP health spending increased from 1.26% (95% CI 1.11% to 1.44%) to 11.45% (95% CI 10.86% to 12.07%) between 2012 and 2023. CHE gaps were also substantial for overall and service-specific OOP health spending. Medical supplies account for a large share of total OOP health spending, with CHE headcount rising from 1.34% (95% CI 1.18% to 1.53%) to 12.24% (95% CI 11.64% to 12.89%) between 2012 and 2023 at the 10% original threshold. Although the results were mixed, rural, northern and low-income households experienced substantial financial burdens. At the 20% threshold, the CHE headcount for inpatient services increased from 0.84% (95% CI 0.64% to 1.10%) to 4.38% (95% CI 3.83% to 4.99%) for northern dwellers between 2012 and 2023.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Despite NHIS coverage, high-cost services like medical supplies, hospital stays and frequently used outpatient services substantially drive CHE in Ghana, particularly for underserved populations. Addressing them requires prioritised policy interventions to expand NHIS coverage for essential services and improve financial protection, especially for rural and low-income households.
加纳在20世纪70年代和90年代实施了多项卫生改革。然而,一些就医障碍仍然存在,包括高额的自付费用,这促使该国在2003年实施了国家健康保险计划(NHIS),以实现全民健康覆盖并降低自付费用。本研究评估了国家健康保险计划实施后加纳家庭灾难性卫生支出(CHE)的发生率和强度,同时考虑了不同卫生服务的自付医疗费用。
数据来自加纳生活水平调查第6轮(2012/2013年)和第7轮(2016/2017年)以及2022/2023年年度家庭收入和支出调查。关键变量是在三类卫生服务(医疗产品、门诊和住院)上的自付费用以及总支出。使用特定服务阈值计算各类卫生服务的灾难性卫生支出发生率和强度。当自付医疗费用占总支出的比例超过特定服务阈值时,家庭在每项服务上即发生灾难性卫生支出。
总体而言,在10%的阈值下,2012年至2023年间,自付医疗总支出的灾难性卫生支出发生率从1.26%(95%置信区间1.11%至1.44%)增至11.45%(95%置信区间10.86%至12.07%)。总体和特定服务的自付医疗支出的灾难性卫生支出差距也很大。医疗用品在自付医疗总支出中占很大比例,在10%的初始阈值下,2012年至2023年间灾难性卫生支出发生率从1.34%(95%置信区间1.18%至1.53%)升至12.24%(95%置信区间11.64%至12.89%)。尽管结果不一,但农村、北部和低收入家庭承受了沉重的经济负担。在20%的阈值下,2012年至2023年间,北部居民住院服务的灾难性卫生支出发生率从0.84%(95%置信区间0.64%至1.10%)升至4.38%(95%置信区间3.83%至4.99%)。
讨论/结论:尽管有国家健康保险计划覆盖,但医疗用品、住院治疗以及频繁使用的门诊服务等高成本服务在加纳仍是灾难性卫生支出的主要驱动因素,尤其是对服务不足的人群而言。解决这些问题需要优先采取政策干预措施,扩大国家健康保险计划对基本服务的覆盖范围,并加强财务保护,特别是针对农村和低收入家庭。