Jung Youn Soo, Johnson Mary M, Burke Marshall, Heft-Neal Sam, Bondy Melissa L, Chinthrajah R Sharon, Cullen Mark R, Nelson Lorene, Dresser Caleb, Nadeau Kari C
Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3326.
A growing body of research suggests that exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5; particle size 2.5 microns or smaller) may be associated with mental health outcomes. However, the potential impact of wildfire-specific PM2.5 exposure on mental health remains underexplored.
To investigate whether wildfire-specific PM2.5 exposure may be associated with emergency department (ED) visits for mental health conditions, including all-cause and for psychoactive substance use, nonmood psychotic disorders, anxiety, depression, and other mood-affective disorders during the extensive 2020 California wildfire season.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data on ED visits from July to December 2020 obtained from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI). Eligible participants were California residents who presented to an ED in California for mental health conditions without COVID-19. The data were analyzed between July 2020 and December 2020.
Wildfire-specific PM2.5 exposure (with up to 7-day lags) based on participants' residential zip codes.
Daily ED visit counts for all-cause and disease-specific mental health conditions (F00-F99) identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes at zip code tabulation areas.
Between July and December 2020, there were 86 609 ED visits for mental health conditions (median [IQR] patient age, 38 [27-54] years; 40 272 female [46.5%]; 10 657 Black [12.3%], 30 044 Hispanic [34.7%], 35 145 White [40.6%]). Visits included psychoactive substance use (23 966 [27.6%]), nonmood psychotic disorders (16 714 [19.3%]), anxiety (26 711 [30.8%]), depression (10 422 [12.0%]), and other mood-affective disorders (5338 [6.2%]). During peak wildfire months, the median (IQR) daily concentration of wildfire-specific PM2.5 increased to 11.9 (3.9-32.5) μg/m3. A 10-μg/m3 increase in wildfire-specific PM2.5 was associated with higher ED visits for all-cause mental conditions (cumulative relative risk [cRR] over lag 0-7 days, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12), depression (cRR over lag 0-7 days, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.30), other mood-affective disorders (cRR over lag 0-7 days, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54), and anxiety (cRR over lag 0-4 days, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12). Subgroup analyses suggested that wildfire smoke was associated with disproportionately increased ED visits among female individuals (eg, depression: cRR over lag 0-4 days, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32) and young people (other mood-affective disorders: cRR over lag 0-4 days, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.98). Effect modification by race was found, with non-Hispanic Black individuals having an increased risk of ED visits for other mood-affective disorders (cRR over lag 0-5 days, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56-3.53) and Hispanic individuals an increased risk for visits for depression (cRR over lag 0-7 days, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.59).
Wildfire smoke exposure was associated with significantly increased odds of subsequent ED visits for mental health conditions in this cross-sectional study, with varying lag times for different subconditions and demographic groups.
越来越多的研究表明,接触细颗粒物(PM2.5;粒径为2.5微米或更小)可能与心理健康结果有关。然而,特定于野火的PM2.5暴露对心理健康的潜在影响仍未得到充分研究。
调查在2020年加利福尼亚州野火肆虐的季节,特定于野火的PM2.5暴露是否可能与因心理健康状况(包括全因性以及使用精神活性物质、非心境性精神病性障碍、焦虑、抑郁和其他情绪情感障碍)而前往急诊科就诊有关。
设计、背景和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了2020年7月至12月从加利福尼亚州医疗保健获取与信息部(HCAI)获得的急诊科就诊数据。符合条件的参与者是加利福尼亚州居民,他们因心理健康状况前往加利福尼亚州的急诊科就诊,且未感染新冠病毒。数据于2020年7月至2020年12月期间进行分析。
根据参与者的居住邮政编码确定特定于野火的PM2.5暴露(最长滞后7天)。
在邮政编码统计区域,使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码确定全因性和特定疾病的心理健康状况(F00 - F99)的每日急诊科就诊次数。
2020年7月至12月期间,因心理健康状况前往急诊科就诊的有86609人次(患者年龄中位数[四分位间距]为38[27 - 54]岁;女性40272人[46.5%];黑人10657人[12.3%],西班牙裔30044人[34.7%],白人35145人[40.6%])。就诊原因包括使用精神活性物质(23966人次[27.6%])、非心境性精神病性障碍(16714人次[19.3%])、焦虑(共26711人次[30.8%])、抑郁(10422人次[12.0%])和其他情绪情感障碍(5338人次[6.2%])。在野火高峰期的几个月里,特定于野火的PM2.5的中位数(四分位间距)日浓度增至11.9(3.9 - 32.5)μg/m³。特定于野火的PM2.5每增加10μg/m³,与全因性心理健康状况的急诊科就诊次数增加相关(滞后0 - 7天的累积相对风险[cRR]为1.08;95%置信区间[CI]为1.03 - 1.12),抑郁(滞后0 - 7天的cRR为1.15;95%CI为1.02 - 1.30),其他情绪情感障碍(滞后0 - 7天的cRR为1.29;95%CI为1.09 - 1.54),以及焦虑(滞后0 - 4天的cRR为1.06;95%CI为1.00 - 1.12)。亚组分析表明,野火烟雾与女性(如抑郁:滞后0 - 4天的cRR为1.17;95%CI为1.03 - 1.32)和年轻人(其他情绪情感障碍:滞后0 - 4天的cRR为1.46;95%CI为1.08 - 1.98)中急诊科就诊次数不成比例地增加有关。发现存在种族效应修正,非西班牙裔黑人个体因其他情绪情感障碍前往急诊科就诊的风险增加(滞后0 - 5天的cRR为2.35;95%CI为1.56 - 3.53),西班牙裔个体因抑郁前往急诊科就诊的风险增加(滞后0 - 7天的cRR为1.30;95%CI为1.06 - 1.59)。
在这项横断面研究中,野火烟雾暴露与随后因心理健康状况前往急诊科就诊的几率显著增加有关,不同亚组情况和人口统计学群体的滞后时间有所不同。