Suppr超能文献

实际中的数据分解:不认为自己是亚洲人的菲律宾裔美国人。

Data Disaggregation in Action: Filipino Americans Who Do Not Identify As Asian.

作者信息

Shimkhada Riti, Juhnke Andrew, Ponce Ninez A

机构信息

Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02398-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) categorizes Filipino Americans as Asian; however, many may not identify as such, opting instead for "other" or Pacific Islander (PI). This study examines the extent to which Filipino Americans select PI or "other" rather than Asian, using a large population-based survey of Californians.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2019, 2020, and 2021 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), the largest state health survey in the U.S. that includes write-in prompts for detailed race and ethnicity data. The focus was on participants who identified as Pacific Islanders and wrote in 'Filipino,' those who selected 'Asian' and specified 'Filipino,' and respondents who chose 'other' and wrote in 'Filipino.'

RESULTS

Our analysis included 1,859 Filipino respondents, revealing that 8.8% identified as Pacific Islander, 85.2% as Asian, and 6.1% as "other." Those identifying as PI were more likely to also identify as Latino/Hispanic, be older, and possess U.S. citizenship compared to those identifying as Asian.

DISCUSSION

Disaggregating Filipino Americans from the broader Asian category in surveys is vital for accurately identifying the community's unique needs. We recommend incorporating open-ended write-in prompts in surveys that ask respondents to first identify their broader race category (e.g. Asian). These prompts help identify and reclassify Filipino respondents who may have identified as PI. Such prompts are also important for other racial/ethnic communities who may be uncertain about how to categorize themselves. Ongoing, dynamic community-driven research is essential for understanding identities and effectively categorizing Filipino Americans and other communities.

摘要

背景

美国管理与预算办公室(OMB)将菲律宾裔美国人归类为亚裔;然而,许多人可能并不认同这一归类,而是选择“其他”或太平洋岛民(PI)。本研究利用一项针对加利福尼亚州居民的大型人口调查,考察菲律宾裔美国人选择PI或“其他”而非亚裔的程度。

方法

我们分析了2019年、2020年和2021年加利福尼亚州健康访谈调查(CHIS)的数据,这是美国最大的州健康调查,其中包括关于详细种族和族裔数据的填写提示。重点关注那些将自己认定为太平洋岛民并填写“菲律宾人”的参与者、选择“亚裔”并注明“菲律宾人”的参与者,以及选择“其他”并填写“菲律宾人”的受访者。

结果

我们的分析纳入了1859名菲律宾受访者,结果显示8.8%的人认定为太平洋岛民,85.2%的人认定为亚裔,6.1%的人认定为“其他”。与认定为亚裔的人相比,认定为PI的人更有可能同时认定为拉丁裔/西班牙裔,年龄更大,并且拥有美国公民身份。

讨论

在调查中将菲律宾裔美国人从更广泛的亚裔类别中区分出来,对于准确识别该群体的独特需求至关重要。我们建议在调查中纳入开放式填写提示,要求受访者首先确定其更广泛的种族类别(例如亚裔)。这些提示有助于识别和重新分类那些可能被认定为PI的菲律宾受访者。此类提示对于其他可能不确定如何进行自我分类的种族/族裔群体也很重要。持续的、由社区推动的动态研究对于理解身份认同以及有效分类菲律宾裔美国人和其他群体至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验