Sirasani Jammi Prasanthi, Gardner Cory, Jung Gihwan, Lee Hyunju, Ahn Tae-Hyuk
Program of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Department of Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Mar 4;26(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf176.
Advances in next-generation sequencing have resulted in a growing understanding of the microbiome and its role in human health. Unlike traditional microbiome analysis, blood and tissue microbiome analyses focus on the detection and characterization of microbial DNA in blood and tissue, previously considered a sterile environment. In this review, we discuss the challenges and methodologies associated with analyzing these samples, particularly emphasizing blood and tissue microbiome research. Key preprocessing steps-including the removal of ribosomal RNA, host DNA, and other contaminants-are critical to reducing noise and accurately capturing microbial evidence. We also explore how taxonomic profiling tools, machine learning, and advanced normalization techniques address contamination and low microbial biomass, thereby improving reliability. While it offers the potential for identifying microbial involvement in systemic diseases previously undetectable by traditional methods, this methodology also carries risks and lacks universal acceptance due to concerns over reliability and interpretation errors. This paper critically reviews these factors, highlighting both the promise and pitfalls of using blood and tissue microbiome analyses as a tool for biomarker discovery.
下一代测序技术的进步使人们对微生物组及其在人类健康中的作用有了越来越深入的了解。与传统的微生物组分析不同,血液和组织微生物组分析专注于检测和表征血液和组织中的微生物DNA,而血液和组织此前被认为是无菌环境。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了与分析这些样本相关的挑战和方法,特别强调血液和组织微生物组研究。关键的预处理步骤,包括去除核糖体RNA、宿主DNA和其他污染物,对于减少噪声和准确捕获微生物证据至关重要。我们还探讨了分类学分析工具、机器学习和先进的标准化技术如何解决污染和低微生物生物量问题,从而提高可靠性。虽然这种方法有可能识别传统方法以前无法检测到的全身性疾病中的微生物参与情况,但由于对可靠性和解释错误的担忧,这种方法也存在风险且缺乏普遍认可。本文批判性地审视了这些因素,强调了将血液和组织微生物组分析作为生物标志物发现工具的前景和缺陷。