Faustini Siân E, Quinn Lauren M, Hoque Madeeha, Young Siobhan, Bentley Christopher, Kwok Hin-Fai, Plant Timothy, Litchfield Ian, Boardman Felicity, Greenfield Sheila M, Narendran Parth, Richter Alex G
Clinical Immunology Services, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Diabet Med. 2025 Aug;42(8):e70071. doi: 10.1111/dme.70071. Epub 2025 May 19.
Islet-specific autoantibodies predate and predict the onset of type 1 diabetes and can be used to screen for presymptomatic disease. Dried blood spots (DBS) offer a convenient and reliable method for community-based capillary sampling requiring low blood volumes compared to venous collection. We aimed to verify the use of DBS for detecting autoantibodies by the ElisaRSR (3-screen) multiplex assay compared to venous sampling and also explore the acceptability of DBS sampling.
Paired serum and DBS samples were collected from healthy controls (HC) and individuals with type 1 diabetes on insulin. Validation and verification of a 3-screen Islet cell autoantibody (IA-2A, GADA and ZnT8A) ELISA assay was undertaken for both matrices and compared. Perceived acceptability of DBS testing was explored via semi-structured interviews with parents and professional stakeholders.
Temporally paired serum and DBS samples were collected for 101 individuals with type 1 diabetes (aged 7-73 years) and 22 HC (aged 18-60 years). Performance characteristics were similar for serum and DBS; sensitivity for serum was 86% compared to 89% for DBS and a specificity of 97% for serum compared to 100% for DBS. Parents (n = 38) and stakeholders (n = 25) thought DBS testing offered a minimally invasive, convenient screening test. Parents emphasised choice of screening location, including home and community settings.
DBS sampling can be used as an alternative to serum for use with the 3-screen assay for general population type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening. DBS sampling appears acceptable to parents and stakeholders.
胰岛特异性自身抗体先于1型糖尿病发病并可预测其发病,可用于筛查症状前疾病。与静脉采血相比,干血斑(DBS)为基于社区的毛细血管采样提供了一种方便可靠的方法,所需血量较少。我们旨在验证与静脉采样相比,通过ElisaRSR(3项筛查)多重检测法使用DBS检测自身抗体的情况,并探讨DBS采样的可接受性。
从健康对照(HC)和接受胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病患者中收集配对的血清和DBS样本。对两种基质进行了3项筛查胰岛细胞自身抗体(IA-2A、GADA和ZnT8A)ELISA检测的验证和比较。通过与家长和专业利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,探讨了DBS检测的可接受性。
收集了101例1型糖尿病患者(年龄7 - 73岁)和22例HC(年龄18 - 60岁)的时间配对血清和DBS样本。血清和DBS的性能特征相似;血清的敏感性为86%,而DBS为89%,血清的特异性为97%,而DBS为100%。家长(n = 38)和利益相关者(n = 25)认为DBS检测提供了一种微创、方便的筛查测试。家长强调了筛查地点的选择,包括家庭和社区环境。
DBS采样可作为血清的替代方法用于一般人群1型糖尿病自身抗体筛查的3项筛查检测。DBS采样似乎为家长和利益相关者所接受。