Chou Oscar Hou-In, Luo Zhiyao, Chung Cheuk To Skylar, Chan Jeffrey, Li Huixian, Lakhani Ishan, Lee Sharen, Lau Dawnie Ho Hei, Zhang Qingpeng, Liu Tong, Wong Wing Tak, Cheung Bernard Man Yung, Lip Gregory Y H, Leung Fung Ping, Tse Gary, Zhou Jiandong
Diabetes Research Unit Cardiovascular Analytics Group Hong Kong China.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e034175. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034175. Epub 2025 May 22.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4Is), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes and prognosis. The comparative risks of new-onset peripheral artery disease (PAD) between these medications remain unknown. This real-world study compared the risks of PAD in patients exposed to SGLT2I and DPP4I.
This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes on either an SGLT2I or a DPP4I between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, using a territory-wide database from Hong Kong. The primary outcome was new-onset PAD. The secondary outcomes were cardiovascular hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) using the nearest neighbor search was performed. Multivariable Cox regression with time-weighted variables was used to identify significant associations. A 3-arm analysis including the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cohort was conducted. This cohort included 75 470 patients with type 2 diabetes (median age, 62.3±12.8 years; 55.79% men). The SGLT2I and DPP4I groups consisted of 28 753 patients and 46 717 patients, respectively. After matching, 186 and 256 patients had PAD in the SGLT2I and DPP4I groups, respectively, over a median follow-up of 5.6 years. SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of PAD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.93]) compared with DPP4I use after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, medications, renal function, and glycemic tests. The association remained consistent regardless of sex, age, and other metabolic diseases. In the 3-arm analysis, the risk of PAD was not statistically different between SGLT2Is and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.52-2.68]). The results remained consistent in the competing risk and the sensitivity analyses.
SGLT2I use among patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with lower risks of new-onset PAD and PAD-related outcomes when compared with DPP4Is after adjustments.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2Is)、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4Is)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂已被证实与改善心血管结局和预后相关。这些药物引发新发外周动脉疾病(PAD)的相对风险仍不明确。这项真实世界研究比较了使用SGLT2I和DPP4I的患者发生PAD的风险。
这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间使用SGLT2I或DPP4I的2型糖尿病患者,数据来源于香港的一个全地区数据库。主要结局是新发PAD。次要结局是心血管住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡。采用最近邻搜索法进行倾向评分匹配(1:1比例)。使用时间加权变量的多变量Cox回归来确定显著关联。进行了一项包括胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂队列的三臂分析。该队列包括75470例2型糖尿病患者(中位年龄62.3±12.8岁;男性占55.79%)。SGLT2I组和DPP4I组分别有28753例和46717例患者。匹配后,在中位随访5.6年期间,SGLT2I组和DPP4I组分别有186例和256例患者发生PAD。在调整人口统计学、合并症、药物治疗、肾功能和血糖检测后,与使用DPP4I相比,使用SGLT2I与较低的PAD风险相关(风险比[HR],0.79[95%CI,0.66 - 0.93])。无论性别、年龄和其他代谢疾病如何,这种关联均保持一致。在三臂分析中,SGLT2Is与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂之间的PAD风险无统计学差异(HR,1.18[95%CI,0.52 - 2.68])。在竞争风险分析和敏感性分析中,结果保持一致。
与DPP4Is相比,2型糖尿病患者使用SGLT2I与较低的新发PAD风险和PAD相关结局风险相关。