Weissman Gary E, Hubbard Rebecca A, Himes Blanca E, Goodman-O'Leary Kelly L, Harhay Michael O, Ginestra Jennifer C, Kohn Rachel, Admon Andrew J, Taylor Stephanie Parks, Halpern Scott D
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1215-1224. eCollection 2024.
Many sepsis prediction models use the Sepsis-3 definition or its variants as a training label. However, among the few sepsis models ever deployed in practice, there is scant evidence that they offer clinically meaningful decision support at the bedside. As a potential mechanism to explain this limitation, we hypothesized that clinician-recommended treatment times for sepsis would diverge from onset time defined by Sepsis-3. We conducted an electronic survey that was completed by 153 clinicians at three large and geographically diverse medical centers using vignettes derived from eight real cases of sepsis. After reviewing these vignettes, participants suggested antibiotic treatment to start an average of 7.0 hours (95% confidence interval 5.3 to 8.8) before the Sepsis-3 definition onset. Thus, predicting Sepsis-3 onset as a treatment prompt could lead to inappropriate and delayed treatment recommendations. Building predictive decision support systems that identify outcomes aligned with bedside decisions would increase their clinical utility.
许多脓毒症预测模型使用脓毒症-3定义或其变体作为训练标签。然而,在实际应用过的少数脓毒症模型中,几乎没有证据表明它们能在床边提供具有临床意义的决策支持。作为解释这一局限性的潜在机制,我们推测临床医生推荐的脓毒症治疗时间会与脓毒症-3定义的发病时间不一致。我们进行了一项电子调查,来自三个地理位置不同的大型医疗中心的153名临床医生使用从八个真实脓毒症病例中提取的病例 vignettes 完成了调查。在查看这些 vignettes 后,参与者建议在脓毒症-3定义发病前平均7.0小时(95%置信区间5.3至8.8)开始使用抗生素治疗。因此,将脓毒症-3发病作为治疗提示进行预测可能会导致不恰当和延迟的治疗建议。构建能够识别与床边决策一致的结果的预测性决策支持系统将提高其临床实用性。