Brake Katie, Matus-Meza Audifás-Salvador, Rawat Purnima, Rikhtechi Pedram, Sadi Kiana Sherkat, Garrison Jered C
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985870 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985830 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Nucl Med Biol. 2025 Jul-Aug;146-147:109031. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2025.109031. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is highly upregulated in the stroma of >90 % of epithelial cancers with restricted expression in normal tissues, making it an attractive drug target. Efforts by numerous laboratories developing FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals have been significant and led to the development of promising diagnostic agents (e.g., [Ga]Ga-FAPI-46). However, the poor tumor residence times of many of these low-molecular-weight agents remain a hurdle to radiotherapeutic clinical translation. Our laboratory has been exploring an endolysosomal trapping approach to increase the tumor residence time of radiopharmaceuticals through irreversible adduct formation using epoxysuccinyl peptide inhibitors. Herein, we explore this approach by incorporating an irreversible inhibitor into a FAP-targeted agent, [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1. Along with controls ([Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46), the biological performance of [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 was examined through a battery of in vitro and in vivo studies using the FAP-positive human U-87MG glioblastoma cell line as our model.
FAPI-ET1, FAPI-SHAM and FAPI-46 were obtained by multi-step synthesis and radiolabeled using [Lu]LuCl. [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 contains the incorporated epoxysuccinyl peptide inhibitor, while [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM is a nearly identical physiochemical control incapable of adduct formation, and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 was used as a clinical benchmark. Western Blot confirmed the FAP expression of U-87MG cells. Kinetics assays of FAPI-ET1 and positive control (E-64) were conducted using human cysteine cathepsin B. In vitro IC, cellular uptake and adduct formation analysis of the three radioconstructs were performed using U-87MG cells. In vivo biodistribution studies were conducted in U-87MG xenograft mouse models, evaluating the constructs at 3-, 24-, 72- and 168-h post-injection time points. FAPI-ET1 and FAPI-SHAM (1.85 ± 0.04 and 0.8 ± 0.7 nM, respectively) exhibited similar FAP binding affinities compared to FAPI-46 (0.9 ± 0.7 nM). FAPI-ET1 demonstrated significantly higher cathepsin B inhibition kinetics (120,000 ± 14,000 M s) than the E-64 inhibitor (42,000 ± 4000 M s). The cellular uptake, including surface-bound and internalized fraction, of [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM were significantly lower than [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 (P ≤ 0.001). By 240 min, the internalized fraction for [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 was 9.9 ± 1.7 %, while [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM were 2.7 ± 0.8 % and 2.7 ± 1.1 %, respectively. When the radioconjugates were incubated with U-87MG cells, two adduct bands were observed at 30-35 and 100 kDa for [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1, while only a single adduct band of 100 kDa was observed for [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46. The 30-35 kDa band for [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 is anticipated due to adduct formation with endolysosomal proteases (e.g., cysteine cathepsins). However, the 100 kDa band for all FAP-targeted agents is attributed to adduct formation between the cyanopyrrolidine moiety of the FAPI-targeted vector and FAP. In vivo biodistribution studies revealed higher initial blood retention for [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM (7 ± 2 and 5.3 ± 1.3 %ID/g, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02) compared to [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 (2.0 ± 0.5 %ID/g) at 3 h but all radioconjugates cleared from the blood by 72 h. On average, [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 and [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM exhibited higher liver and kidney uptake (P > 0.05) than [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 at 3 h. At later time points, [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 retained significantly higher levels of activity in the liver and kidneys (P < 0.05) compared to [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM, indicating that adduct formation increased tissue retention. [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 (15 ± 8 %ID/g) demonstrated significantly higher uptake (P < 0.0001) in U-87MG tumors, compared to [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 (7 ± 4 %ID/g) or [Lu]Lu-FAPI-SHAM (3.5 ± 0.8 %ID/g). However, [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 demonstrated significantly prolonged tumor retention in U-87MG xenograft tumors at 168 h, with a five-fold increase compared to [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46.
[Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 demonstrates that the endolysosomal trapping approach can be successfully implemented in FAP-targeted agents and achieve enhanced FAP-positive U-87MG tumor residualization. Although the decreased internalization rate and in vivo targeting of [Lu]Lu-FAPI-ET1 compared to [Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 and the ambiguity concerning FAP-mediated internalization efficacy due to targeting vector adduct formation are hurdles to the current implementation. Future approaches are focused on better characterizing FAP adduct formation and cellular trafficking to reveal new pathways to optimize the endolysosomal trapping approach for FAP-targeted agents.
成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)在90%以上的上皮癌基质中高度上调,在正常组织中表达受限,使其成为一个有吸引力的药物靶点。众多实验室在开发FAP靶向放射性药物方面付出了巨大努力,并取得了显著成果,开发出了有前景的诊断剂(如[镓]Ga-FAPI-46)。然而,许多这些低分子量药物在肿瘤中的滞留时间较短,仍然是放射治疗临床转化的一个障碍。我们实验室一直在探索一种内溶酶体捕获方法,通过使用环氧琥珀酰肽抑制剂形成不可逆加合物来增加放射性药物在肿瘤中的滞留时间。在此,我们通过将不可逆抑制剂整合到FAP靶向剂[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1中来探索这种方法。连同对照([镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM和[镥]Lu-FAPI-46)一起,使用FAP阳性的人U-87MG胶质母细胞瘤细胞系作为模型,通过一系列体外和体内研究来检测[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1的生物学性能。
FAPI-ET1、FAPI-SHAM和FAPI-46通过多步合成获得,并使用[镥]LuCl进行放射性标记。[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1含有整合的环氧琥珀酰肽抑制剂,而[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM是一种几乎相同的物理化学对照物,不能形成加合物,[镥]Lu-FAPI-46用作临床基准。蛋白质免疫印迹法证实了U-87MG细胞的FAP表达。使用人半胱氨酸组织蛋白酶B对FAPI-ET1和阳性对照(E-64)进行动力学测定。使用U-87MG细胞对三种放射性构建体进行体外IC、细胞摄取和加合物形成分析。在U-87MG异种移植小鼠模型中进行体内生物分布研究,在注射后3、24、72和168小时的时间点评估这些构建体。与FAPI-46(0.9±0.7 nM)相比,FAPI-ET1和FAPI-SHAM(分别为1.85±0.04和0.8±0.7 nM)表现出相似的FAP结合亲和力。FAPI-ET1表现出比E-64抑制剂(42,000±4000 M s)显著更高的组织蛋白酶B抑制动力学(12,000±14,000 M s)。[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1和[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM的细胞摄取,包括表面结合和内化部分,显著低于[镥]Lu-FAPI-46(P≤0.001)。到240分钟时,[镥]Lu-FAPI-46的内化部分为9.9±1.7%,而[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1和[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM分别为2.7±0.8%和2.7±1.1%。当放射性缀合物与U-87MG细胞孵育时,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1在30-35 kDa和100 kDa处观察到两条加合物带,而[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM和[镥]Lu-FAPI-46仅在100 kDa处观察到一条加合物带。[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1的30-35 kDa带预计是由于与内溶酶体蛋白酶(如半胱氨酸组织蛋白酶)形成加合物所致。然而,所有FAP靶向剂的100 kDa带归因于FAPI靶向载体的氰基吡咯烷部分与FAP之间形成的加合物。体内生物分布研究表明,与[镥]Lu-FAPI-46(2.0±0.5%ID/g)相比,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1和[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM在3小时时的初始血液滞留率更高(分别为7±2和5.3±1.3%ID/g,P<0.0001和P=0.02),但所有放射性缀合物在72小时时从血液中清除。平均而言,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1和[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM在3小时时的肝脏和肾脏摄取量比[镥]Lu-FAPI-46更高(P>0.05)。在随后的时间点,与[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM相比,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1在肝脏和肾脏中保留的活性水平显著更高(P<0.05),表明加合物的形成增加了组织滞留。[镥]Lu-FAPI-46(15±8%ID/g)在U-87MG肿瘤中的摄取量显著高于[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1(7±4%ID/g)或[镥]Lu-FAPI-SHAM(3.5±0.8%ID/g)(P<0.0001)。然而,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1在168小时时在U-87MG异种移植肿瘤中的肿瘤滞留时间显著延长,与[镥]Lu-FAPI-46相比增加了五倍。
[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1表明内溶酶体捕获方法可以成功应用于FAP靶向剂,并实现增强的FAP阳性U-87MG肿瘤残留。尽管与[镥]Lu-FAPI-46相比,[镥]Lu-FAPI-ET1的内化率降低和体内靶向性降低,以及由于靶向载体加合物形成导致的FAP介导的内化功效的不确定性是当前实施的障碍。未来的方法集中在更好地表征FAP加合物的形成和细胞转运,以揭示优化FAP靶向剂内溶酶体捕获方法的新途径。