Robba Chiara, McCredie Victoria, Chesnut Randall M, Citerio Giuseppe, Gauss Tobias, Hawryluk Gregory W J, Helbok Raimund, Meyfroidt Geert, Newcombe Virginia, Sarwal Aarti, Taccone Fabio S, van der Jagt Mathieu, Wahlster Sarah, Zanier Elisa R, Bouzat Pierre
Department of Surgical Science and Integrated Diagnostic, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07967-1.
Despite advances in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and the implementation of new diagnostic techniques and monitoring modalities, the rate of poor neurological outcomes remains high. Specialized neurocritical care units have been shown to improve outcomes. Guidelines have been developed, but most recommendations are based on low levels of evidence. This has led to substantial heterogeneity in clinical practice for many aspects of TBI management, including multimodal neuromonitoring indications, treatment of intra- and extra-cranial complications, and use of prognostic tools. New tools have recently emerged, such as biomarkers and the use of artificial intelligence, but further research is needed to establish their application in clinical practice. This narrative review aims to describe standards of practice for the management of TBI in the ICU, highlighting current evidence and knowledge gaps, to provide a pragmatic approach for clinicians caring for this population.
尽管重症监护病房(ICU)中创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的管理取得了进展,并且实施了新的诊断技术和监测方式,但神经功能不良结局的发生率仍然很高。专门的神经重症监护病房已被证明可改善结局。虽然已经制定了指南,但大多数建议基于低水平的证据。这导致了TBI管理许多方面的临床实践存在很大异质性,包括多模态神经监测指征、颅内和颅外并发症的治疗以及预后工具的使用。最近出现了一些新工具,如生物标志物和人工智能的应用,但需要进一步研究以确定它们在临床实践中的应用。本叙述性综述旨在描述ICU中TBI管理的实践标准,突出当前的证据和知识差距,为护理这一人群的临床医生提供一种实用方法。