Suppr超能文献

用于预测疼痛的PrePain问卷的开发与验证

Development and validation of the PrePain questionnaire for predicting pain.

作者信息

Gedin Filip, Hellerström Andreas, Blome Sebastian, Jensen Karin, Andreasson Anna, Lalouni Maria

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 9, D3, 17165, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Psychobiology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09044-5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and construct validity of the PrePain questionnaire in both the general population and a long-term pain population. The PrePain questionnaire is an 11-item self-administered tool that assesses current pain intensity, long-term pain history, and attitudes, emotions, and behaviors related to pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). This non-randomized observational study included 200 participants: 100 individuals with long-term pain and 100 without. Participants were recruited from a specialist pain rehabilitation clinic and via social media. The study involved baseline and follow-up assessments using the PrePain questionnaire, the Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI-14), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation for test-retest reliability, sign rank-test for sensitivity to change, Cronbach's α for internal consistency, principal component analysis for subscale analysis, and mixed-effects linear regression for test of criterion validity. A total of 187 participants completed the study. The PrePain questionnaire demonstrated acceptable face validity and moderate test-retest reliability (coefficients ranging from 0.58 to 0.73). Internal consistency was α = 0.63. Principal component analysis suggested a two or three-factor solution. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between PrePain items and SHAI-14 and CSQ catastrophizing, except for the pain sensitivity item. No significant changes were observed in the clinical group between baseline and follow-up assessments. The resuts provide preliminary evidence for the reliability of The PrePain questionnaire and its validity for assessing attitudes, emotions, and behaviors related to pain in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Further research is needed to explore its sensitivity to change and utility in clinical practice.

摘要

本研究旨在评估PrePain问卷在普通人群和长期疼痛人群中的心理测量特性及结构效度。PrePain问卷是一个包含11个条目的自填式工具,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估当前疼痛强度、长期疼痛史以及与疼痛相关的态度、情绪和行为。这项非随机观察性研究纳入了200名参与者:100名长期疼痛患者和100名无疼痛者。参与者从一家专业疼痛康复诊所和通过社交媒体招募。该研究涉及使用PrePain问卷、简短健康焦虑量表(SHAI - 14)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)进行基线和随访评估。统计分析包括用于重测信度的Spearman相关性分析、用于变化敏感性的符号秩检验、用于内部一致性的Cronbach's α分析、用于子量表分析的主成分分析以及用于效标效度检验的混合效应线性回归分析。共有187名参与者完成了研究。PrePain问卷表现出可接受的表面效度和中等的重测信度(系数范围为0.58至0.73)。内部一致性为α = 0.63。主成分分析表明存在两因素或三因素解决方案。除疼痛敏感性条目外,PrePain问卷条目与SHAI - 14及CSQ灾难化之间的显著相关性支持了效标效度。在临床组的基线和随访评估之间未观察到显著变化。这些结果为PrePain问卷的可靠性及其在临床和非临床人群中评估与疼痛相关的态度、情绪和行为的效度提供了初步证据。需要进一步研究以探索其对变化的敏感性及其在临床实践中的效用。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the PrePain questionnaire for predicting pain.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09044-5.
2
The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):59-70. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002718. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
6
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.

本文引用的文献

2
Pain Catastrophizing: How Far Have We Come.
Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 26;16(3):483-501. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16030036.
7
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
9
Pain, nicotine, and tobacco smoking: current state of the science.
Pain. 2020 Aug;161(8):1688-1693. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001874. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验