Wilkojc Michal, Gwozdz Pawel, Kosinski Sylweriusz, Pankowski Juliusz, Szlubowski Artur, Kiszka-Wilkojc Aleksandra, Czajkowski Wojciech, Kwiatkowski Robert, Zielinski Marcin
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Pulmonary Hospital, 34-500 Zakopane, Poland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pulmonary Hospital, 34-500 Zakopane, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;17(13):2207. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132207.
: The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficiency between combined endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)/endoesophageal ultrasound (EUS) and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) for preoperative staging of mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). : Between June 2011 and December 2017, a single-institution prospective randomized trial was conducted, and 250 patients with cytologically confirmed NSCLC, clinical stages cI-IIIA, were included. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed in all patients. After exclusions, 204 patients were randomized into the EBUS/EUS or TEMLA arms. Patients without N2/N3 metastases after mediastinal staging underwent surgery. The diagnostic yield and complication rates of the EBUS/EUS and TEMLA groups were compared. : There were 103 patients in the EBUS/EUS group, and N2 metastases were found in nine cases (8.7%). Ninety-four patients underwent surgery; in six cases, previously unsuspected N2 metastases were revealed. One hundred and one patients were randomized to the TEMLA group, which detected N2/N3 metastases in 15 cases (15.1%). Three patients were not operated on due to postoperative complications following TEMLA. Eighty-three patients underwent surgery, and a single N2 metastatic nodule was detected in one case. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 94%, 100%, 99%, 100%, and 99% for TEMLA, respectively, and 60%, 100%, 94%, 100%, and 94% for EBUS/EUS, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity (60% vs. 94%) between the EBUS/EUS and TEMLA groups in favor of the TEMLA group. Postoperative complications occurred in 6/101 (6%) patients after TEMLA, while no complications were observed in the EBUS/EUS group. : TEMLA demonstrated superior sensitivity for detecting N2/3 disease compared to EBUS/EUS in terms of diagnostic performance for mediastinal staging of cI-IIIA NSCLC. Due to its more invasive nature, TEMLA was associated with a higher number of complications compared with EBUS/EUS.
本研究旨在比较支气管内超声(EBUS)/食管内超声(EUS)联合检查与经颈扩大纵隔淋巴结清扫术(TEMLA)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔淋巴结术前分期中的诊断效能。2011年6月至2017年12月,开展了一项单机构前瞻性随机试验,纳入250例经细胞学确诊、临床分期为cI-IIIA期的NSCLC患者。所有患者均接受正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)检查。排除部分患者后,204例患者被随机分为EBUS/EUS组或TEMLA组。纵隔分期后无N2/N3转移的患者接受手术治疗。比较EBUS/EUS组和TEMLA组的诊断率及并发症发生率。EBUS/EUS组有103例患者,其中9例(8.7%)发现N2转移。94例患者接受手术,其中6例发现术前未怀疑的N2转移。101例患者被随机分入TEMLA组,其中15例(15.1%)检测到N2/N3转移。3例患者因TEMLA术后并发症未接受手术。83例患者接受手术,其中1例发现单个N2转移结节。TEMLA组的诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94%、100%、99%、100%和99%,EBUS/EUS组分别为60%、100%、94%、100%和94%。EBUS/EUS组与TEMLA组在敏感性方面存在显著差异(60%对94%),TEMLA组更具优势。TEMLA术后6/101(6%)例患者出现并发症,而EBUS/EUS组未观察到并发症。就cI-IIIA期NSCLC纵隔分期的诊断性能而言,TEMLA在检测N2/3疾病方面显示出比EBUS/EUS更高的敏感性。由于其侵入性更强,与EBUS/EUS相比,TEMLA的并发症更多。