Suppr超能文献

遵循“治疗并延长”方案的玻璃体腔抗VEGF治疗的糖尿病性黄斑病变患者的治疗终止情况

Treatment Cessation in Patients with Diabetic Maculopathy under Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy Following a Treat-and-Extend Protocol.

作者信息

Saucedo Lucia, Pfister Isabel B, Schild Christin, Garweg Justus G

机构信息

Swiss Eye Institute, Rotkreuz, Berner Augenklinik, Bern, Switzerland.

Department Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jun 2;5(6):100838. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100838. eCollection 2025 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of treatment cessation due to disease stability in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

A single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients with DME who had received their first anti-VEGF treatment between 2012 and 2021, a Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (VA) ≥0.1, and a follow-up of ≥24 months.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, best-corrected VA, OCT biomarkers over time, and injection details were collected from patients' medical records. Treatment interruption was defined as a treatment-free interval of ≥25 weeks after the last injection for any reason. An active decision for treatment interruption due to a stable retinal situation was defined as treatment cessation. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of patients experiencing treatment cessation, time to treatment cessation and to reuptake, and change in best-corrected VA and central retinal thickness.

RESULTS

Beyond 109 eyes treated over ≥24 months, 81 eyes (62 patients) met the inclusion criteria. During a follow-up of 5.5 ± 2.3 (median 5) years, patients received 22.6 ± 14.9 (median 20) intravitreal injections, 7.7 ± 3.0 (8.0) of these in the first year. Fifty-seven eyes (70.4%) experienced ≥1 planned treatment cessation of ≥25 weeks, while 4 eyes experienced an unplanned treatment interruption. Treatment cessation was documented in 53 eyes (65.4%) 65.2 ± 52.4 (median 42) weeks after treatment initiation for 106.2 ± 110.4 (median 54) weeks. The reason for treatment cessation was patient-driven in 1 eye (1.9%; the patient wished to stop treatment against medical advice), physician-driven in 38 eyes (71.7%; stable VA, despite persisting residual retinal fluid in OCT), and OCT-driven in 14 eyes (26.4%; no retinal fluid in OCT). Baseline parameters were comparable between eyes experiencing treatment cessation and those which did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment cessation was achieved in 70% of eyes with DME after intensive treatment during the first year. This calls for a discussion about a possible systematic assessment of disease stability by omitting a single injection in eyes with stable residual retinal fluid.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

摘要

目的

评估因糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)病情稳定而停止治疗的眼部治疗效果。

设计

单中心、回顾性、连续病例系列研究。

研究对象

2012年至2021年间接受首次抗VEGF治疗、最佳矫正视力(Snellen视力表)≥0.1且随访时间≥24个月的DME患者。

方法

从患者病历中收集基线特征、最佳矫正视力、随时间变化的OCT生物标志物以及注射详情。治疗中断定义为因任何原因在最后一次注射后无治疗间隔≥25周。因视网膜情况稳定而主动决定中断治疗定义为停止治疗。数据以均值±标准差表示。

主要观察指标

停止治疗的患者百分比、停止治疗及重新开始治疗的时间、最佳矫正视力和中心视网膜厚度的变化。

结果

在接受≥24个月治疗的109只眼中,81只眼(62例患者)符合纳入标准。在5.5±2.3(中位数5)年的随访期间,患者接受了22.6±14.9(中位数20)次玻璃体内注射,其中第一年为7.7±3.0(8.0)次。57只眼(70.4%)经历了≥1次计划内的≥25周治疗中断,而4只眼经历了非计划内的治疗中断。在治疗开始后65.2±52.4(中位数42)周,53只眼(65.4%)记录到停止治疗,持续时间为106.2±110.4(中位数54)周。停止治疗的原因中,1只眼(1.9%)是患者自行决定(患者不顾医生建议希望停止治疗);38只眼(71.7%)是医生决定(尽管OCT显示仍有残留视网膜积液,但视力稳定);14只眼(2

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7b/12273413/c17180aee525/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验