Duan Rufei, Yang Hongying, Zhai Xiuwei, Yu Jing, Lu Chen, Yang Wenmin, Long Tingfeng, Dao Yan, Li Gaofeng, Zhou Yongchun, Zheng Hongyi, Zhao Fanghui, Zheng Yong-Tang, Huang Yunchao
Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519 Kunzhou Road, Xishan District, Kunming, 650118, Yunnan, China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiaochang Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26390. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09292-5.
To evaluate the accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling samples for HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in rural Yunnan of China. In 2022, 3000 women aged 17-69 were recruited and provided self-sampling vaginal samples alongside provider-sampling samples for HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA testing, as well as artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted cytology. Women who tested positive for any high-risk HPV DNA or mRNA, or who displayed cytology abnormalities, were recalled for a colposcopy examination and biopsied when necessary. The accuracy of these tests in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) and CIN3 + was evaluated. The sensitivity of the HPV DNA test for self-sampling was 96.2%, compared to 92.3% for provider-sampling, 73.1% for the mRNA test, and 53.9% for AI-assisted cytology in detecting CIN2 + . The specificity was 83.9% for self-sampling HPV DNA test, 86.4% for provider-sampling HPV DNA test, 91.4% for the mRNA test, and 94.2% for AI-assisted cytology. The area under the curve (AUC) values for these screening methods were 0.90, 0.90, 0.82, and 0.74, respectively. Only 37% of participants preferred the self-sampling model, with lower preference observed among older women, those from rare minority groups, those with lower education levels, and who displayed limited knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling HPV DNA testing demonstrated comparable clinical accuracy to provider-sampling test and were more accurate than that of mRNA test and AI-assisted cytology. Self-sampling HPV testing offers a promising screening strategy in rural Yunnan China. Applicable health education is urgently needed to improve the acceptability of 'self-sampling' model among the target population.
评估中国云南农村地区用于宫颈癌筛查的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测自采样样本的准确性和可接受性。2022年,招募了3000名年龄在17至69岁的女性,她们提供了自采样阴道样本以及由医护人员采集的样本,用于HPV DNA和E6/E7 mRNA检测,以及人工智能(AI)辅助细胞学检查。对任何高危HPV DNA或mRNA检测呈阳性,或显示细胞学异常的女性,会被召回进行阴道镜检查,并在必要时进行活检。评估了这些检测在检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更严重病变(CIN2+)和CIN3+方面的准确性。在检测CIN2+时,HPV DNA自采样检测的灵敏度为96.2%,医护人员采样检测为92.3%,mRNA检测为73.1%,AI辅助细胞学检测为53.9%。HPV DNA自采样检测的特异性为83.9%,医护人员采样HPV DNA检测为86.4%,mRNA检测为91.4%,AI辅助细胞学检测为94.2%。这些筛查方法的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.90、0.90、0.82和0.74。只有37%的参与者更喜欢自采样模式,在老年女性、少数民族群体、教育水平较低以及对宫颈癌筛查的知识、态度和行为有限的人群中,偏好较低。自采样HPV DNA检测显示出与医护人员采样检测相当的临床准确性,并且比mRNA检测和AI辅助细胞学检测更准确。自采样HPV检测在中国云南农村地区提供了一种有前景的筛查策略。迫切需要开展适用的健康教育,以提高目标人群对“自采样”模式的可接受性。