Koch Elias At, Seidel Christina, Erber Ramona, Erdmann Michael, Heppt Markus V, Schliep Stefan, Berking Carola, Dörrie Jan, Schaft Niels
Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), CCC Erlangen-EMN, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Pathol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1002/path.6450.
Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is a promising target for melanoma immunotherapy, but its expression in benign melanocytic lesions and its diagnostic value remain unexplored. This study assessed CSPG4 expression in benign nevi (BN), dysplastic nevi (DN), and superficial spreading melanomas (SSM), comparing it with PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) and evaluating the cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7) and the proliferation marker Ki67. Histological sections were stained using automated instruments, digitized, and analyzed using QuPath. Cohorts of BN, DN, and SSM were created, and positive cells/mm and H-scores were determined. A total of 336 IHC stainings from 84 specimens were analyzed. CSPG4 expression was readily detected in SSM and was significantly stronger in DN (p = 0.005), with the highest intensity observed in BN (p < 0.001). PRAME showed the highest density of positive cells/mm in SSM, was significantly reduced in DN (p < 0.001), and was lowest in BN (p < 0.001). Ki67 expression was strong in SSM, moderate in DN (p = 0.62), and low in BN (p = 0.008). CDC7 expression was most intense in DN, less in SSM (p = 0.39), and weakest in BN (p = 0.002). ROC AUC values for SSM versus DN and SSM versus BN were 0.764 and 0.921 for CSPG4, 0.85 and 0.889 for PRAME, 0.735 and 0.742 for Ki67, and 0.425 and 0.767 for CDC7. While PRAME was the most reliable marker for differentiating DN and SSM, CSPG4 was superior for distinguishing BN from SSM due to its high expression in BN. However, CSPG4-targeting therapies may trigger on-target/off-tumor effects due to its high expression in melanocytic nevi. © 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
硫酸软骨素蛋白聚糖4(CSPG4)是黑色素瘤免疫治疗的一个有前景的靶点,但其在良性黑素细胞病变中的表达及其诊断价值仍未得到探索。本研究评估了CSPG4在良性痣(BN)、发育异常痣(DN)和浅表扩散性黑色素瘤(SSM)中的表达,并将其与黑色素瘤优先表达抗原(PRAME)进行比较,同时评估细胞分裂周期7相关蛋白激酶(CDC7)和增殖标志物Ki67。组织学切片使用自动仪器进行染色、数字化处理,并使用QuPath进行分析。创建了BN、DN和SSM队列,并确定了每平方毫米阳性细胞数和H评分。共分析了来自84个标本的336次免疫组化染色。在SSM中很容易检测到CSPG4表达,在DN中显著更强(p = 0.005),在BN中观察到的强度最高(p < 0.001)。PRAME在SSM中每平方毫米阳性细胞密度最高,在DN中显著降低(p < 0.001),在BN中最低(p < 0.001)。Ki67表达在SSM中较强,在DN中中等(p = 0.62),在BN中较低(p = 0.008)。CDC7表达在DN中最强烈,在SSM中较少(p = 0.39),在BN中最弱(p = 0.002)。CSPG4在区分SSM与DN以及SSM与BN时的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.764和0.921,PRAME为0.85和0.889,Ki67为0.735和0.742,CDC7为0.425和0.767。虽然PRAME是区分DN和SSM最可靠的标志物,但由于CSPG4在BN中高表达,因此在区分BN和SSM方面更具优势。然而,由于CSPG4在黑素细胞痣中高表达,靶向CSPG4的疗法可能会引发靶向脱瘤效应。© 2025作者。《病理学杂志》由约翰·威利父子有限公司代表大不列颠及爱尔兰病理学会出版。