Evaluation of the Diagnosis and Antibiotic Therapy of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study.

: Sepsis is one of the most common causes of death worldwide, and its diagnosis remains a challenge for clinicians. The main purpose of this study was to appraise the diagnosis and antibiotic prescription pattern for sepsis admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), comparing Sepsis-2 to Sepsis-3 criteria. : The study was conducted in an ED of a tertiary care medical center in Hungary. We included all adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis in 2023. Data collection was made manually from UD MED System. Diagnosis was assessed based on Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria, then compared. Further analyses were made only in cases with confirmed sepsis diagnosis. Antibiotic guideline adherence was determined according to the local guideline in force. Fisher's exact test, -test, and ANOVA were applied to compare categorical and continuous variables between groups. The Kaplan-Meier test was applied for probability of survival. Significant -values were defined as below 0.05. : The substantial majority of patients recorded with sepsis in the ED met both the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria (80%), while the rate of misdiagnosis was similar (Sepsis-2: 16/91, 17.6% and Sepsis-3: 14/91, 15.4%). The most important identified risk factors in sepsis were old age (60+ years) and comorbidities (CCI ≥ 4). Elevated LDH (median 325 mg/dL) and decreased albumin levels (median 26 g/L) can be used as early indicators of sepsis. Although the time to first antibiotic administration was not associated with significantly better clinical outcomes, the guideline-adherent agent selection (Sepsis-2: 18/43, 41.9% and Sepsis-3: 19/46: 41.3%) led to a significantly longer survival (median 37 vs. 4 days). : No significant differences were found in diagnostic accuracy or prediction of mortality between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3. Guideline-adherent antibiotics may lead to significantly higher survival rate in sepsis.