Daikos George L, Cisneros José Miguel, Carmeli Yehuda, Wang Minggui, Leong Chee Loon, Pontikis Konstantinos, Anderzhanova Anastasia, Florescu Simin, Kozlov Roman, Rodriguez-Noriega Eduardo, Psichogiou Mina, Rattanaumpawan Pinyo, Streinu-Cercel Anca, Ramasubramanian Venkatasubramanian, Arhin Francis F, Rogers Halley, Wible Michele, Leaney Joanne, Jacobson Daria, Pypstra Rienk, Chow Joseph W
Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115-27 Athens, Greece.
Virgen del Rocío University Hospital-IBiS, CIBERINFEC, Seville, Spain.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jul 28;7(4):dlaf131. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf131. eCollection 2025 Aug.
The Phase 3 ASSEMBLE study investigated aztreonam-avibactam versus best available therapy (BAT) for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) or bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by confirmed MBL-producing multidrug-resistant pathogens.
This prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, central assessor-blinded study randomized hospitalized adults 2:1 to aztreonam-avibactam [+ metronidazole (cIAI)] or BAT for 5-14 (cIAI, cUTI and BSI) or 7-14 (HAP/VAP) days. Primary endpoint was clinical cure at test-of-cure (TOC) visit on Day 28 ± 3 [microbiological ITT (micro-ITT) analysis set]. Secondary endpoints included microbiological response at TOC, 28-day mortality and safety. No formal hypothesis testing was planned.
Fifteen patients were randomized [aztreonam-avibactam, = 12; BAT, = 3 (ITT and micro-ITT analysis sets)]. Most frequent baseline pathogens were Enterobacterales; was most common [aztreonam-avibactam, 6/12 (50%); BAT, 2/3 (67%)]. MBL subtypes/variants identified in the aztreonam-avibactam group were NDM-1 ( = 7), NDM-5 ( = 3), VIM-2 ( = 2) and L1 ( = 3); and for BAT were NDM-1 ( = 2) and NDM-5 ( = 1). Clinical cure rates at TOC were 5/12 (42%) for aztreonam-avibactam and 0/3 (0%) for BAT. Per-patient microbiological responses were generally consistent with clinical responses. Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality rates for aztreonam-avibactam and BAT were 1/12 (8%) and 1/3 (33%), respectively. Aztreonam-avibactam was generally well-tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events.
These Phase 3 data provide support for aztreonam-avibactam as a potential therapeutic option for difficult-to-treat infections caused by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria.
3期ASSEMBLE研究比较了氨曲南-阿维巴坦与最佳可用治疗方案(BAT)用于治疗由确诊的产金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的多重耐药病原体引起的复杂性腹腔内感染(cIAI)、复杂性尿路感染(cUTI)、医院获得性/呼吸机相关性肺炎(HAP/VAP)或血流感染(BSI)。
这项前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、中心评估者设盲的研究将住院成人按2:1随机分组,分别接受氨曲南-阿维巴坦[+甲硝唑(cIAI)]或BAT治疗5 - 14天(cIAI、cUTI和BSI)或7 - 14天(HAP/VAP)。主要终点是在第28±3天的治愈试验(TOC)访视时的临床治愈情况[微生物意向性分析集(micro-ITT)]。次要终点包括TOC时的微生物学反应、28天死亡率和安全性。未计划进行正式的假设检验。
15例患者被随机分组[氨曲南-阿维巴坦组,n = 12;BAT组,n = 3(意向性分析集和微生物意向性分析集)]。最常见的基线病原体是肠杆菌科细菌;肺炎克雷伯菌最常见[氨曲南-阿维巴坦组,6/12(50%);BAT组,2/3(67%)]。在氨曲南-阿维巴坦组中鉴定出的MBL亚型/变体为NDM-1(n = 7)、NDM-5(n = 3)、VIM-2(n = 2)和L1(n = 3);BAT组为NDM-1(n = 2)和NDM-5(n = 1)。TOC时的临床治愈率,氨曲南-阿维巴坦组为5/12(42%),BAT组为0/3(0%)。每位患者的微生物学反应总体上与临床反应一致。氨曲南-阿维巴坦组和BAT组的28天全因死亡率分别为1/12(8%)和1/3(33%)。氨曲南-阿维巴坦总体耐受性良好,未出现与治疗相关的严重不良事件。
这些3期数据支持氨曲南-阿维巴坦作为治疗由产MBL的革兰阴性菌引起的难治性感染的一种潜在治疗选择。