Suppr超能文献

间歇性禁食和无糖饮食对新冠长期症状的影响:一项随机交叉试验。

Intermittent fasting and a no-sugar diet for Long COVID symptoms: a randomized crossover trial.

作者信息

Bunker Thomas, Horne Benjamin D, Baldwin Mark D, Sorrells Robert, Turner Sabrina, Laube Laynee, Solomon Ari, Horne Lucy A, Novack Jeffrey

机构信息

Independent Patient Researcher, Boulder, CO, USA.

Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27563. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07461-0.

Abstract

Long COVID (LC) is a common chronic health condition that impairs daily functioning and social connections. This is the first randomized clinical trial to directly compare the effect of two Intermittent Fasting regimens on LC symptoms. The main objectives of this 10-week randomized cross-over trial are to compare the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks of 1-2 day fasting plus a restricted diet vs 4 weeks of mild time-restricted eating (TRE) and a restricted diet in reducing patient-reported LC symptoms. After a 2-week run-in, subjects were randomized to treatment A (TRE) or treatment B (Fasting) for 4 weeks. Subjects then crossed over to the other treatment for 4 weeks. The median fasting duration was 38 h (night-day-night), and the mean duration was 42 h. Symptoms were assessed via weekly online surveys. Primary outcomes were changes in LC symptom severity scores (LC-Scores) and in the number of LC symptoms (numLCsym) between treatments. Secondary outcomes were changes in LC-Scores and numLCsym over the 10-week trial. Fasting was superior to TRE alone in reducing LC-Scores (p = 0.008). The numLCsym decreased - 5.0 during the Fasting 4 weeks vs - 1.4 in the TRE 4 weeks (p = 0.002). Altogether, the 10-week regimen of a no-sugar diet, TRE and Fasting decreased the mean LC-Score by 51.8% (p < 0.0001) from 37.8 to 18.2. Similarly, numLCsym decreased from 20.5 to 12.2, a decrease of 40.6% (p < 0.0001). No major adverse safety events were recorded. Both intermittent fasting interventions decreased symptoms over the 10-week trial but the more intense fasting regimen was significantly better.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06214455.

摘要

长新冠(LC)是一种常见的慢性健康状况,会损害日常功能和社交联系。这是第一项直接比较两种间歇性禁食方案对长新冠症状影响的随机临床试验。这项为期10周的随机交叉试验的主要目标是比较4周的1 - 2天禁食加限制饮食与4周的轻度限时进食(TRE)加限制饮食在减轻患者报告的长新冠症状方面的疗效和安全性。在进行2周的导入期后,受试者被随机分配到治疗A(TRE)或治疗B(禁食)组,为期4周。然后受试者交叉接受另一种治疗4周。禁食的中位持续时间为38小时(夜间 - 白天 - 夜间),平均持续时间为42小时。通过每周的在线调查评估症状。主要结局是治疗之间长新冠症状严重程度评分(LC评分)和长新冠症状数量(numLCsym)的变化。次要结局是在10周试验期间LC评分和numLCsym的变化。在降低LC评分方面,禁食优于单独的TRE(p = 0.008) 。禁食的4周内numLCsym减少了 - 5.0,而TRE的4周内减少了 - 1.4(p = 0.002)。总体而言,无糖饮食、TRE和禁食的10周方案使平均LC评分从37.8降至18.2,降低了51.8%(p < 0.0001)。同样,numLCsym从20.5降至12.2,下降了40.6%(p < 0.0001)。未记录到重大不良安全事件。在10周试验中,两种间歇性禁食干预都减轻了症状,但更严格的禁食方案效果明显更好。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT06214455 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f06/12307605/865b889750c1/41598_2025_7461_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验