Kącka-Stańczak Anna, Charemska-Ronchini Anna, Odyjewska Emilia, Jarocka-Cyrta Elżbieta, Głowińska-Olszewska Barbara
Department of Clinical Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Provincial Specialist Children's Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland.
Department of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025;31(2):44-51. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2025.152594.
Excess body weight has a negative impact on the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and is an additional risk factor for the development of chronic vascular complications, insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We compared and analyzed metabolic control, the incidence of insulin resistance and MAFLD in children and youths with T1D and excessive body weight (T1D-E) and those with T1D and normal body weight (T1D-N).
The study included 32 patients with T1D-N and 31 patients with T1D-E. Daily insulin requirement, estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR1, eGDR2), HbA1C%, lipid profile, vitamin D level, cIMT value, and MAFLD prevalence were compared in relation to body mass index (BMI) and BMI SD score (BMI-SDS).
T1D-E patients compared to T1D-N had higher systolic (125.58 ±8.18 vs. 120.16 ±10.02 mmHg, p = 0.022) and diastolic blood pressure (78.19 ±7.03 vs. 73.94 ±7.95 mmHg, p = 0.028), triglyceride levels (118.19 ±71.20 vs. 71.31 ±18.76 mg/dl, p = 0.001) and waist circumference (p < 0.001). Lower eGDR values were noted in T1D-E vs. T1D-N: eGDR1: 5.16 ±1.33 vs. 6.96 ±1.32; eGDR2: 9.37 ±1.21 vs. 10.66 ±0.9 (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001). Vitamin D levels were lower and the incidence of MAFLD was higher in the T1D-E group (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.014). Patients with MAFLD had worse lipid profile results and higher cIMT values (0.48 vs. 0.43 mm, p = 0.4).
Excessive body weight in patients with T1D leads to elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, and increases the risk of MAFLD. Patients with MAFLD have a higher future cardiovascular risk, expressed as an increased cIMT value.
超重对1型糖尿病(T1D)的管理有负面影响,并且是慢性血管并发症、胰岛素抵抗和代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)发生的额外风险因素。我们比较并分析了超重的T1D儿童和青少年(T1D-E)与体重正常的T1D儿童和青少年(T1D-N)的代谢控制情况、胰岛素抵抗发生率和MAFLD情况。
该研究纳入了32例T1D-N患者和31例T1D-E患者。比较了每日胰岛素需求量、估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR1、eGDR2)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)百分比、血脂谱、维生素D水平、颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)值和MAFLD患病率与体重指数(BMI)和BMI标准差评分(BMI-SDS)的关系。
与T1D-N患者相比,T1D-E患者的收缩压(125.58±8.18 vs. 120.16±10.02 mmHg,p = 0.022)和舒张压(78.19±7.03 vs. 73.94±7.95 mmHg,p = 0.028)、甘油三酯水平(118.19±71.20 vs. 71.31±18.76 mg/dl,p = 0.001)和腰围更高(p < 0.001)。T1D-E患者的eGDR值低于T1D-N患者:eGDR1:5.16±1.33 vs. 6.96±1.32;eGDR2:9.37±1.21 vs. 10.66±0.9(p = 0.0001,p = 0.0001)。T1D-E组的维生素D水平较低,MAFLD发生率较高(13% vs. 0%,p = 0.014)。MAFLD患者的血脂谱结果更差,cIMT值更高(0.48 vs. 0.43 mm,p = 0.4)。
T1D患者超重会导致血压升高、血脂异常和胰岛素抵抗,并增加MAFLD的风险。MAFLD患者未来心血管风险更高,表现为cIMT值升高。