Yalçın Seçkin, Özel Selin, Çamyar Dilara, Bonabian Emir Farboud
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(2):620-636. doi: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.14.2.620. eCollection 2025.
The capacity of to adhere to diverse oral substrates constitutes a pivotal preliminary phase in the formation of a pathogenic fungal biofilm. Yeast cells demonstrate a considerable ability to bind to host tissues, encompassing dental structures and mucosal surfaces, in addition to synthetic, non-biological materials such as dental appliances. Biomaterials utilized for the restoration of oral functionality are prone to biofilm formation, which can detrimentally affect oral health. Oral microorganisms can adhere to both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces; however, in vivo investigations indicate that hydrophobic surfaces tend to accumulate minimal biofilm due to differential shear forces. Rough surfaces are observed to retain more biofilm compared to their smooth counterparts. The presence of biofilms on composite materials and glass-ionomer cement types results in surface degradation, consequently fostering additional biofilm development. While the leaching of residual monomers from composites has been shown to influence biofilm proliferation in vitro, the effect in vivo appears to be less consequential, likely attributable to the dilution and continual renewal of saliva. Furthermore, research has produced inconsistent findings regarding the influence of fluoride release from glass-ionomer cement types. A comparative analysis is conducted between biomaterial-associated infections in implants and devices situated in other anatomical regions and the formation of oral biofilms. The discourse critically evaluates alterations to biomaterials aimed at diminishing biofilm formation on implants and devices, taking into account their prospective applications within dentistry. The conclusion reached is that for dental applications, antimicrobial coatings that exterminate fungi upon contact are deemed more efficacious than those that gradually release antimicrobial agents.
真菌粘附于多种口腔底物的能力是致病性真菌生物膜形成的关键初始阶段。酵母细胞不仅能够与合成的非生物材料(如牙科器械)结合,还展现出与包括牙齿结构和粘膜表面在内的宿主组织结合的显著能力。用于恢复口腔功能的生物材料容易形成生物膜,这会对口腔健康产生不利影响。口腔微生物能够粘附于疏水和亲水表面;然而,体内研究表明,由于不同的剪切力,疏水表面往往积累最少的生物膜。与光滑表面相比,粗糙表面会保留更多的生物膜。复合材料和玻璃离子水门汀类型的材料上生物膜的存在会导致表面降解,进而促进更多生物膜的形成。虽然已表明复合材料中残留单体的浸出会在体外影响生物膜增殖,但在体内的影响似乎较小,这可能归因于唾液的稀释和持续更新。此外,关于玻璃离子水门汀类型材料释放氟化物的影响,研究结果并不一致。对植入物和位于其他解剖区域的器械中与生物材料相关的感染以及口腔生物膜的形成进行了比较分析。该论述批判性地评估了旨在减少植入物和器械上生物膜形成的生物材料的改变,并考虑了它们在牙科领域的潜在应用。得出的结论是,对于牙科应用,接触时能杀灭真菌的抗菌涂层比逐渐释放抗菌剂的涂层更有效。