Jung Joeun, Jo Ah-Reum, Kim Yuna, Park Eun-Ah, Heo Jin-Yeong, Park Na-Youn, Wrobel Sonja A, Koch Holger M, Park Jeongim, Lee Aram, Tantrakarnapa Kraichat, Kliengchuay Wissanupong, Niampradit Sarima, Tosepu Ramadhan, Umar Ani, Hossain Khaled, Goni Osman, Park Hyunwoong, Kho Younglim, Choi Kyungho
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 26;59(33):17431-17442. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c04600. Epub 2025 Aug 15.
Children are considered vulnerable to plasticizer exposure and related adverse health effects. In many Asian countries, however, the extent of plasticizer exposure among children is poorly understood despite the increasing use of plasticizers. This study compared plasticizer exposure levels and risks among children in four Asian countries and investigated the major risk drivers. Children aged 6-14 years old were recruited between 2022 and 2023 from Korea ( = 89), Thailand ( = 111), Indonesia ( = 100), and Bangladesh ( = 100). They were measured for major metabolites of phthalates and nonphthalate plasticizers in the first morning void urine. Indonesian and Bangladeshi children showed higher exposure to phthalates but lower exposure to nonphthalate alternatives. At the same time, children from Thailand and Korea exhibited a greater transition to the alternatives. In all countries, DEHA contributed to over 80% of the total estimated daily intake (EDI) for all plasticizers. Bangladeshi children exhibited 1.5-2 times greater total plasticizer exposure than the children of the other countries across all EDI quartiles. Among the high-risk subgroup (within the top 25th percentile of the hazard index), DEHP accounted for 62 and 52% of the cumulative risk in Indonesia and Bangladesh, while DnBP contributed to 63 and 54% in Thailand and Korea, respectively. Our observations reveal critical disparities in plasticizer exposure among Asian children, highlighting an urgent need for follow-up investigations on the exposure sources of major risk drivers and region-specific interventions.
儿童被认为易受增塑剂暴露及相关健康不良影响。然而,在许多亚洲国家,尽管增塑剂的使用不断增加,但对儿童增塑剂暴露程度的了解却很少。本研究比较了四个亚洲国家儿童的增塑剂暴露水平和风险,并调查了主要风险驱动因素。2022年至2023年期间,招募了来自韩国(n = 89)、泰国(n = 111)、印度尼西亚(n = 100)和孟加拉国(n = 100)的6至14岁儿童。测量了他们晨尿中邻苯二甲酸酯和非邻苯二甲酸酯增塑剂的主要代谢物。印度尼西亚和孟加拉国儿童的邻苯二甲酸酯暴露较高,但非邻苯二甲酸酯替代品的暴露较低。与此同时,来自泰国和韩国的儿童向替代品的转变更大。在所有国家,DEHA占所有增塑剂估计每日总摄入量(EDI)的80%以上。在所有EDI四分位数中,孟加拉国儿童的总增塑剂暴露比其他国家的儿童高1.5至2倍。在高风险亚组(危险指数前25%)中,DEHP在印度尼西亚和孟加拉国的累积风险中分别占62%和52%,而DnBP在泰国和韩国的累积风险中分别占63%和54%。我们的观察结果揭示了亚洲儿童增塑剂暴露的关键差异,突出了迫切需要对主要风险驱动因素的暴露源进行后续调查以及采取针对特定区域的干预措施。