Hoben Matthias, Ubell Andrea, Maxwell Colleen J, Allana Saleema, Doupe Malcolm B, Symonds-Brown Holly, Hogan David B, Daly Tamara, Tate Kaitlyn C, Wagg Adrian, Nguyen Hung, Berta Whitney, Bethell Jennifer, Caspar Sienna, Goodarzi Zahra, McGrail Kimberlyn, Cummings Greta G, Rowe Melanie, Kay Kelly, Kostyk Patricia, Lazaruk Kevin, MacLean Barbara, Mann Jim, Prescott Katrina
School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2846. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23896-6.
Persons with dementia, their family/friend caregivers, and health systems agree that the preferred place of dementia care is a person's home. Health systems have struggled to provide sufficient community-based dementia care supports, negatively affecting the health and well-being of persons with dementia and their caregivers. Therefore, dementia care and support of dementia caregivers are critical public health priorities. Adult day programs aim to simultaneously support the health and well-being of persons with dementia and their caregivers, but research focusing on these day program outcomes is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to compare various outcomes of day program attendees with dementia and their caregivers over time to outcomes of non-attendees with dementia in the community (with care needs similar to those of attendees) and their caregivers.
In each of four Canadian health regions (York Region, Ontario; Interior Health, British Columbia; Calgary, Alberta; Winnipeg, Manitoba), this study will recruit 250 day program attendees with dementia and their caregivers, and 500 community-based non-attendees with dementia and their caregivers. Applying criteria used by the health system to determine day program eligibility, we will identify non-attendees with care needs similar to those of attendees. We will combine participants' longitudinal health administrative data with repeated (baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up) surveys to include variables not routinely collected by healthcare systems. Primary study outcomes are quality of life of the person with dementia and their caregiver. Secondary study outcomes include mental health (older adults, caregivers), cognitive and physical decline (older adults), time to admission to congregate care (older adults), and emergency room, hospital, and primary care use (older adults, caregivers). Using a day program survey, we will also assess day program characteristics. Using covariate-adjusted general estimating equations and time-to-event models, we will compare these outcomes between groups of day program exposure (no, low, medium, high).
Persons living with dementia, their caregivers, and health systems urgently need solutions to support living at home with a good quality of life. This study will generate provide evidence on the potential of day programs to address these critical public healt needs.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06496945.
痴呆症患者、他们的家人/朋友照顾者以及卫生系统都认为,痴呆症护理的首选地点是患者的家中。卫生系统一直在努力提供足够的社区痴呆症护理支持,这对痴呆症患者及其照顾者的健康和福祉产生了负面影响。因此,痴呆症护理和对痴呆症照顾者的支持是关键的公共卫生优先事项。成人日间项目旨在同时支持痴呆症患者及其照顾者的健康和福祉,但缺乏关注这些日间项目成果的研究。本研究的主要目的是比较随着时间推移,参加日间项目的痴呆症患者及其照顾者的各种结果与社区中未参加项目的痴呆症患者(护理需求与参加者相似)及其照顾者的结果。
在加拿大的四个卫生区域(安大略省约克地区;不列颠哥伦比亚省内陆卫生区;艾伯塔省卡尔加里;马尼托巴省温尼伯),本研究将招募250名参加日间项目的痴呆症患者及其照顾者,以及500名社区非参加项目的痴呆症患者及其照顾者。应用卫生系统用于确定日间项目资格的标准,我们将识别出护理需求与参加者相似的非参加者。我们将把参与者的纵向健康管理数据与重复(基线、1年和2年随访)调查相结合,以纳入医疗保健系统通常不收集的变量。主要研究结果是痴呆症患者及其照顾者的生活质量。次要研究结果包括心理健康(老年人、照顾者)、认知和身体衰退(老年人)、入住集体护理机构的时间(老年人)以及急诊室、医院和初级保健的使用情况(老年人、照顾者)。通过日间项目调查,我们还将评估日间项目的特征。使用协变量调整的广义估计方程和事件时间模型,我们将比较日间项目暴露组(无、低、中、高)之间的这些结果。
痴呆症患者、他们的照顾者以及卫生系统迫切需要解决方案来支持在家中过上高质量的生活。本研究将为日间项目满足这些关键公共卫生需求的潜力提供证据。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06496945。