Bhagar R, Le-Niculescu H, Corey S C, Gettelfinger A S, Schmitz M, Ebushi A, Matei E, Woods C, Mullen J, Kurian S M, Shekhar A, White F A, Niculescu A B
Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03186-8.
Chronic pain remains a massive problem in society in general, and in mental health patients in particular, being strongly bi-directionally connected to mental health. Lack of widespread use of objective information has hampered treatment and prevention efforts. Pain is a spectrum of severity, from transient vague discomfort to chronic excruciating incapacitation. Blood biomarkers that track pain severity can provide a window into the biology of pain, as well as could help with assessment and treatment. A previous study by us was positive. Here we describe new studies we conducted trans-diagnostically in psychiatric patients, starting with the whole genome, to expand the identification, prioritization, validation and testing of blood gene expression biomarkers for pain. We carried out two separate studies, on two different platforms, microarrays and RNA sequencing, using for each study a multiple independent cohorts design. This ensured biological and technical reproducibility. We then focused at the end on biomarkers that were convergent and reproducible between the two studies. We found new as well as previously known biomarkers that were predictive of high pain states, and of future emergency department visits related to them, using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Using a polyevidence score, the overall top decreased in expression biomarker ("pain-suppressor gene") was CD55, a gene that suppresses the complement cascade and cell damage. The top increased biomarker ("algogene") was ANXA1, a gene that is an effector of glucocorticoid-mediated responses and regulator of the inflammatory processes. The top biological pathways were related to cellular response to TNF and to neuroinflammation. The top upstream regulator was TNF. Top therapeutic matches overall were the medications lithium and ketamine, as well as the nutraceuticals omega-3 fatty acids and magnesium. Drug repurposing bioinformatic analyses also identified the potential of carvedilol, sirolimus, budesonide, berbamine, and quetiapine, as well as of medications already used to treat pain such as amyleine, sulindac, sufentanil, carbamazepine, and meclofenamic acid, that serve as de facto positive controls. Additionally, we show how personalized patient reports for doctors would look like based on blood biomarkers testing, to aid with objective assessment of severity and risk, as well with individualized matching to medications and nutraceuticals. Given the fact that pain disorders are highly prevalent, can severely affect quality of life, and even lifespan, there is an urgent need for insights and tools such as the ones we have developed to be applied to and improve clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention options.
慢性疼痛总体上仍是社会中的一个重大问题,在心理健康患者中尤为如此,它与心理健康存在着强烈的双向联系。客观信息缺乏广泛应用阻碍了治疗和预防工作。疼痛有不同的严重程度,从短暂的模糊不适到慢性的极度失能。追踪疼痛严重程度的血液生物标志物可以为疼痛生物学提供一个窗口,也有助于评估和治疗。我们之前的一项研究结果是阳性的。在此,我们描述了我们在精神科患者中进行的跨诊断新研究,从全基因组开始,以扩大对疼痛血液基因表达生物标志物的识别、优先级排序、验证和测试。我们在两个不同的平台——微阵列和RNA测序上进行了两项独立研究,每项研究都采用了多个独立队列设计。这确保了生物学和技术的可重复性。然后我们最终聚焦于两项研究中一致且可重复的生物标志物。我们使用横断面和纵向方法,发现了新的以及先前已知的可预测高疼痛状态以及与之相关的未来急诊就诊情况的生物标志物。使用多证据评分,表达下降最明显的生物标志物(“疼痛抑制基因”)是CD55,该基因可抑制补体级联反应和细胞损伤。表达增加最明显的生物标志物(“致痛基因”)是ANXA1,该基因是糖皮质激素介导反应的效应器以及炎症过程的调节因子。最主要的生物学途径与细胞对肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)的反应以及神经炎症有关。最主要的上游调节因子是TNF。总体上最匹配的治疗药物是锂盐和氯胺酮,以及营养保健品ω-3脂肪酸和镁。药物再利用生物信息学分析还确定了卡维地洛、西罗莫司、布地奈德、小檗胺和喹硫平的潜力,以及已经用于治疗疼痛的药物如阿美林、舒林酸、舒芬太尼、卡马西平和甲氯芬那酸的潜力,这些药物可作为事实上的阳性对照。此外,我们展示了基于血液生物标志物检测的针对医生的个性化患者报告的样子,以帮助客观评估严重程度和风险,以及实现与药物和营养保健品的个性化匹配。鉴于疼痛障碍非常普遍,会严重影响生活质量甚至寿命,迫切需要像我们开发的这样的见解和工具来应用并改善临床诊断、治疗和预防方案。