Burrows Kate, Luo Jiajun, Cai Yuxuan, Aschebrook-Kilfoy Briseis
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Environ Res. 2025 Aug 24;285(Pt 5):122691. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.122691.
Despite known environmental inequities, the impact of air pollution on mental health across diverse populations remains uncharacterized, with prior research limited largely to cross-sectional studies or homogeneous cohorts. In this paper we evaluated associations between long-term fine particulate matter (PM) exposure and incident depression and anxiety in a large, diverse cohort and investigated effect modification by race/ethnicity, insurance status, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status. We used data from the All of Us Research Program (2018-2022) to analyze two cohorts (n > 100,000 each) to identify incident cases of depression and anxiety. We assigned annual average PM concentrations based on residential zip-codes and used Cox proportional hazards models with natural cubic splines to estimate associations, adjusting for individual and community-level covariates. For a 10-μg/m3 increase in PM, the hazard ratio (HR) was 2.14 (95 % CI: 1.41, 3.24) for anxiety and 1.66 (95 % CI: 1.02, 2.70) for depression. Comparing highest to lowest PM quartile, the HR was 1.10 (95 % CI: 1.03-1.19) for anxiety and 1.45 (95 % CI: 1.33-1.57) for depression. Depression risks were elevated even at PM levels below the EPA standard of 9.0 μg/m, while anxiety risks increased only at higher concentrations. Black participants showed approximately twice the risk of both outcomes compared to other racial groups, which may reflect the cumulative impacts of systemic racism in the United States, including residential segregation, limited healthcare access, and chronic stress. Results emphasize the need for targeted interventions in communities facing multiple structural disadvantages.
尽管存在已知的环境不平等现象,但空气污染对不同人群心理健康的影响仍未得到充分描述,先前的研究主要局限于横断面研究或同质化队列。在本文中,我们评估了长期暴露于细颗粒物(PM)与一个大型多样化队列中抑郁症和焦虑症发病之间的关联,并研究了种族/族裔、保险状况和社区层面社会经济地位对这种关联的影响。我们使用了“我们所有人”研究计划(2018 - 2022年)的数据来分析两个队列(每个队列n > 100,000),以确定抑郁症和焦虑症的发病病例。我们根据居住邮政编码分配年度平均PM浓度,并使用带有自然三次样条的Cox比例风险模型来估计关联,同时对个体和社区层面的协变量进行调整。PM每增加10μg/m³,焦虑症的风险比(HR)为2.14(95%置信区间:1.41, 3.24),抑郁症的风险比为1.66(95%置信区间:1.02, 2.70)。将PM最高四分位数与最低四分位数进行比较,焦虑症的HR为1.10(95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.19),抑郁症的HR为1.45(95%置信区间:1.33 - 1.57)。即使在PM水平低于美国环境保护局9.0μg/m的标准时,抑郁症风险也会升高,而焦虑症风险仅在更高浓度时增加。与其他种族群体相比,黑人参与者出现这两种结果的风险大约是其他种族群体的两倍,这可能反映了美国系统性种族主义的累积影响,包括居住隔离、有限的医疗保健机会和慢性压力。研究结果强调了对面临多种结构性劣势的社区进行有针对性干预的必要性。