Tj Cadet, Ck Brown, M Hu, Z Ahn, M Siska, R Halmo, Schonberg M
School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
School of Arts & Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251372677. doi: 10.1177/10732748251372677. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
IntroductionAchieving health literacy is a primary goal of Healthy People 2030 due to the increasing recognition of its role to improve the health and well-being of all populations. Shared decision-making (SDM), a recognized process between patients and health care providers to discuss which health care decision is best for the patient considering the pros and cons, patient preferences, and circumstances, can improve health outcomes. Specifically, SDM can increase patient knowledge and the quality of decision-making, resulting in patients feeling more empowered, demonstrating less decisional regret, and more motivation. Yet, limited health literacy (LHL) can hinder a patient's ability to engage in the SDM process. Patients' ability to engage in SDM can be helped by improving health literacy levels, and by the suitability of the tools available to support them. Decision aids (DA) are educational tools that can help with SDM. SDM provides patients with the necessary skills, which, when paired with DAs designed with and for populations with LHL, can improve communication with health care providers.MethodsGuided by elements of the Ottawa Decision Framework and principles of human-centered design, in this retrospective study we aimed to develop a novel and current brief colon cancer screening DA, "Making a Decision: Should I Stop or Continue Colon Cancer Screening - Ages 75-85," based on feedback from adults ≥75 years at risk for LHL in two focus groups and a comprehensive health literacy demand assessment of the "Making a Decision About Colon Cancer Screening" using four tools to determine its readability, understandability, and actionability.ResultsFindings include a DA that was viewed favorably by older adult participants who were at risk for LHL.ConclusionsWith feedback from older adults at risk for LHL, we have developed a DA that can be tested in a larger randomized control trial.
引言
鉴于人们日益认识到健康素养在改善所有人群的健康和福祉方面的作用,实现健康素养是“健康人民2030”的首要目标。共同决策(SDM)是患者与医疗保健提供者之间公认的过程,旨在考虑利弊、患者偏好和具体情况,讨论哪种医疗保健决策对患者最有利,它可以改善健康结果。具体而言,共同决策可以增加患者的知识和决策质量,使患者感到更有自主权,减少决策遗憾,并增强动力。然而,有限的健康素养(LHL)可能会阻碍患者参与共同决策过程。提高健康素养水平以及提供合适的工具来支持患者,可以帮助患者参与共同决策。决策辅助工具(DA)是有助于共同决策的教育工具。共同决策为患者提供了必要的技能,当与为有限健康素养人群设计并供其使用的决策辅助工具相结合时,可以改善与医疗保健提供者的沟通。
方法
在渥太华决策框架的要素和以人为本设计原则的指导下,在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在根据两个焦点小组中75岁及以上有有限健康素养风险的成年人的反馈,以及使用四种工具对“关于结肠癌筛查的决策”进行的全面健康素养需求评估,开发一种新颖且最新的简短结肠癌筛查决策辅助工具,即“做出决定:75 - 85岁的我应该停止还是继续结肠癌筛查”,以确定其可读性、可理解性和可操作性。
结果
研究结果包括一个受到有有限健康素养风险的老年参与者好评的决策辅助工具。
结论
在有有限健康素养风险的老年人的反馈帮助下,我们开发了一种可以在更大规模的随机对照试验中进行测试的决策辅助工具。