Stensvold Christen Rune
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
Clinical microbiology involves the detection and differentiation of primarily bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi in patients with infections. Billions of people may be colonised by one or more species of common luminal intestinal parasitic protists (CLIPPs) that are often detected in clinical microbiology laboratories; still, our knowledge on these organisms' impact on global health is very limited. The genera Blastocystis, Dientamoeba, Entamoeba, Endolimax and Iodamoeba comprise CLIPPs species, the life cycles of which, as opposed to single-celled pathogenic intestinal parasites (e.g., microsporidia and sporozoa), do probably not include gut-invasive stages that could result in pathological processes and thereby disease (except for Entamoeba histolytica). All five genera are parasites in the sense that they use a host to complete their life cycle; still, by many specialists, these are considered to be of limited clinical relevance and could possibly be referred to as 'eukaryotic endobionts' or even 'endosymbionts', in case they would have health-protective effects. The articles included in this thesis exemplify the work and the data that support the view that it might be more relevant to study these genera in a public health and gut ecology context than in a clinical microbiology context. Essential to investigating the impact of intestinal parasites on health and disease are accurate diagnostic tools, including DNA-based technology such as PCR and sequencing, plus accurate reference databases. Small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes consistently present in both pro- and eukaryotic organisms are today avidly used as taxonomic markers. DNA-based methods have been developed for genetic characterisation of microorganisms and provided data on species/subtypes/genotypes, etc. Metagenomics and metabarcoding (the use of low-specific PCR coupled with next-generation sequencing) can provide information on co-infection/co-colonisation with other organisms and enable screening for genetic diversity, even in complex matrices. By developing and implementing sensitive and specific DNA-based diagnostic tools and typing assays primarily based on the SSU rRNA gene, we have increased insight into the diversity, distribution and significance of CLIPPs. With these tools, we have shown that the genera Blastocystis and Dientamoeba are far more common than previously thought. Only 10-15 years ago, hypotheses on their distribution typically relied on data generated by traditional parasitological diagnostic methods, such as light microscopy. Hence, we have shown that most older children in Nigeria host Blastocystis, and that most children in day-care institutions in Denmark, if not all, get colonised by Dientamoeba at some point. Single-celled non-pathogenic intestinal parasites can be hosted by patients with diarrhoea and functional or inflammatory bowel diseases. However, emerging data appear to suggest that CLIPPs are generally more common in gut-healthy individuals than in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. The research we have carried out on associations between CLIPPs and gut bacteria suggests that colonisation with these parasites is seen primarily in individuals with a healthy 'gut flora' (eubiosis). This observation should prompt future research projects focusing on the use of CLIPPs as biomarkers, and it should be investigated to which extent manipulation with CLIPPs could lead to changes in the gut flora and thereby be used as probiotics. In the event that it makes sense to speak of 'infection' by CLIPPs, we still lack tools to differentiate between colonisation and infection. We have known for decades that morphologically similar parasites can differ in terms of clinical impact and be genetically distinct, a feature that we refer to as 'cryptic genetic diversity'. One example is E. histolytica, which cannot be differentiated from Entamoeba dispar by cyst morphological features. However, whereas E. histolytica can be invasive and give rise to amoebic dysentery and amoebiasis, E. dispar is by most specialists considered non-invasive and generally non-pathogenic. This insight led us to investigate genetic diversity among other species of Entamoeba as well as other CLIPPs genera. If we could demonstrate similar-or higher-degrees of diversity within Blastocystis, Dientamoeba, Endolimax and Iodamoeba, these differences might be key to explaining differences in parasite phenotype and thereby differences in the ability of the parasites to cause symptoms. Despite the disclosure of striking genetic diversity among some CLIPPs, we have found little support for such theories; however, more studies are needed. As for Dientamoeba, we have observed a more or less clonal expansion of one of the two genotypes known to exist, and this genotype appears to have global predominance. In contrast, extensive genetic diversity is observed between and within subtypes of Blastocystis: to date, more than 30 species, the so-called subtypes, have been acknowledged. We, and many others, have sought to identify whether one or more of these subtypes could be linked to the development of intestinal symptoms, but there is little evidence to support this hypothesis. We know that Subtypes 1-4 reflect about 95% of Blastocystis colonisation in humans, and we have shown that individuals with zoonotic subtypes (e.g., ST6, ST7 and ST8) might typically experience symptoms. We have disclosed astonishing genetic variation among other CLIPPs, which has led to the recognition of Iodamoeba bütschlii, Endolimax nana, Entamoeba coli and Entamoeba hartmanni as species complexes, where each species should be regarded as a complex of species (referred to as 'subtypes' or 'ribosomal lineages') with overlapping morphology. And where E. histolytica and E. dispar differ by only 1%-2% diversity across the SSU rRNA gene, we have observed up to at least 10% and 30% genetic difference among ribosomal lineages within E. coli and I. bütschlii, respectively, challenging species concepts currently applied. Our research has resulted in the recognition of three ribosomal lineages within both E. coli and E. hartmanni, as well as two ribosomal lineages of E. nana and I. bütschlii. Moreover, we have discovered a new lineage of Entamoeba moshkovskii. Molecular characterisation of intestinal parasites collected from different host species (humans, non-human primates, other mammals, birds, etc.) can help identify opportunity for transmission between human and non-human hosts. We have shown that pigs can host a few species/lineages that can readily colonise humans, such as Entamoeba hartmanni and I. bütschlii. Many other species of larger mammals are common hosts of Blastocystis and Entamoeba. However, for the two latter genera, the species/genetic variants observed in non-human hosts are typically different from those observed in humans, which could indicate that many species of CLIPPs have adapted to their respective hosts over a long period, resulting in relatively high host specificity. For Blastocystis, we have shown that even though a given subtype may be found in more than one host species, it is possible to demonstrate cryptic host specificity at allele level. For instance, even though both human and non-human primates can be colonised by ST3, host species-specific strains of ST3 circulate within these two host populations. With regards to E. coli, it is possible that ST1 has adapted to human hosts, while E. coli ST2 has adapted to a broader host range, including non-human primates and rodents. It has become clear that CLIPPs are common colonisers of the human background population, and even though we cannot disprove the existence of infection by any of these, it should be reasonable to consider clinical and medical intervention redundant in most cases. Perhaps it might even be so that one should try not to eradicate these organisms from the gut when first established. However, more studies are warranted to elucidate the significance of the pronounced genetic diversity observed in some CLIPPs with regards to transmission patterns and clinical significance. Future research in CLIPPs should also include studies that can elucidate those factors that favour colonisation with CLIPPs and what role CLIPPs have in host-gut ecology, metabolism and overall health condition. Finally, as human and non-human hosts share these parasitic genera, and as some protozoa possibly contribute to overall gut function in ruminants, it would be interesting to study these in domesticated and wild animals to learn more about the role of these parasites in health and disease, including investigations into whether some CLIPPs might be endosymbionts.
临床微生物学主要涉及对感染患者体内细菌、病毒、寄生虫和真菌的检测与鉴别。数十亿人可能被一种或多种常见的腔道肠道寄生原生生物(CLIPPs)定植,这些生物常在临床微生物学实验室中被检测到;然而,我们对这些生物体对全球健康影响的了解非常有限。芽囊原虫属、双核内阿米巴属、溶组织内阿米巴属、内蜒属和碘阿米巴属构成了CLIPPs物种,与单细胞致病性肠道寄生虫(如微孢子虫和孢子虫)不同,它们的生命周期可能不包括可导致病理过程进而引发疾病的肠道侵袭阶段(溶组织内阿米巴除外)。从它们利用宿主来完成生命周期这一意义上来说,这五个属都是寄生虫;不过,许多专家认为这些寄生虫的临床相关性有限,如果它们具有健康保护作用,甚至可能被称为“真核内共生菌”或“内共生菌”。本论文中的文章举例说明了相关工作和数据,支持了这样一种观点,即在公共卫生和肠道生态背景下研究这些属可能比在临床微生物学背景下更具相关性。准确的诊断工具对于研究肠道寄生虫对健康和疾病的影响至关重要,包括基于DNA的技术,如PCR和测序,以及准确的参考数据库。原核生物和真核生物中都始终存在的小亚基(SSU)核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因,如今被广泛用作分类标记。基于DNA的方法已被开发用于微生物的遗传特征分析,并提供了关于物种/亚型/基因型等的数据。宏基因组学和元条形码技术(使用低特异性PCR结合下一代测序)可以提供与其他生物体共感染/共定植的信息,并能够筛查遗传多样性,即使是在复杂的样本中。通过开发和实施主要基于SSU rRNA基因的灵敏且特异的基于DNA的诊断工具和分型检测方法,我们对CLIPPs的多样性、分布和重要性有了更深入的了解。借助这些工具,我们发现芽囊原虫属和双核内阿米巴属比以前认为的更为常见。仅在10 - 15年前,关于它们分布的假说通常依赖于传统寄生虫学诊断方法(如光学显微镜)产生的数据。因此,我们发现尼日利亚的大多数大龄儿童感染了芽囊原虫,而丹麦日托机构中的大多数儿童(如果不是全部的话)在某个阶段都被双核内阿米巴定植。腹泻患者以及功能性或炎症性肠病患者可能会感染单细胞非致病性肠道寄生虫。然而,新出现的数据似乎表明,CLIPPs在肠道健康个体中通常比有胃肠道症状的患者更为常见。我们对CLIPPs与肠道细菌之间关联的研究表明,这些寄生虫的定植主要见于具有健康“肠道菌群”(共生状态)的个体。这一观察结果应促使未来开展聚焦于将CLIPPs用作生物标志物的研究项目,并且应该研究对CLIPPs的操控在多大程度上可能导致肠道菌群的变化,从而被用作益生菌。如果有理由提及CLIPPs的“感染”,我们仍然缺乏区分定植和感染的工具。几十年来我们已经知道,形态相似的寄生虫在临床影响方面可能不同,并且在基因上也有差异,我们将这一特征称为“隐性遗传多样性”。一个例子是溶组织内阿米巴,它通过囊肿形态特征无法与迪斯帕内阿米巴区分开来。然而,溶组织内阿米巴具有侵袭性,可引发阿米巴痢疾和阿米巴病,而大多数专家认为迪斯帕内阿米巴是非侵袭性的,通常无致病性。这一认识促使我们研究其他溶组织内阿米巴属物种以及其他CLIPPs属中的遗传多样性。如果我们能够证明芽囊原虫属、双核内阿米巴属、内蜒属和碘阿米巴属内存在相似程度或更高程度的多样性,这些差异可能是解释寄生虫表型差异以及由此导致的寄生虫引发症状能力差异的关键。尽管在一些CLIPPs中发现了显著的遗传多样性,但我们几乎没有找到支持此类理论的证据;然而,还需要更多的研究。至于双核内阿米巴,我们观察到已知存在的两种基因型之一或多或少存在克隆性扩增,并且这种基因型似乎在全球占主导地位。相比之下,在芽囊原虫属的亚型之间以及亚型内部都观察到了广泛的遗传多样性:迄今为止,已确认了30多个物种,即所谓的亚型。我们和其他许多人都试图确定这些亚型中的一种或多种是否与肠道症状的发展有关,但几乎没有证据支持这一假设。我们知道亚型1 - 4约占人类芽囊原虫定植的95%,并且我们已经表明,感染人畜共患亚型(如ST6、ST7和ST8)的个体可能通常会出现症状。我们还发现其他CLIPPs中存在惊人的遗传变异,这导致碘阿米巴、内蜒阿米巴、结肠内阿米巴和哈氏内阿米巴被认为是物种复合体,其中每个物种都应被视为具有重叠形态的物种复合体(称为“亚型”或“核糖体谱系”)。溶组织内阿米巴和迪斯帕内阿米巴在SSU rRNA基因上的差异仅为1% - 2%,而我们分别观察到结肠内阿米巴和碘阿米巴的核糖体谱系之间的遗传差异高达至少10%和30%,这对目前应用的物种概念提出了挑战。我们的研究已确认结肠内阿米巴和哈氏内阿米巴内有三个核糖体谱系,以及内蜒阿米巴和碘阿米巴有两个核糖体谱系。此外,我们还发现了莫氏内阿米巴的一个新谱系。对从不同宿主物种(人类、非人灵长类动物、其他哺乳动物、鸟类等)收集的肠道寄生虫进行分子特征分析,有助于确定人类和非人类宿主之间的传播机会。我们已经表明,猪可以携带一些能够轻易定植于人类的物种/谱系,如哈氏内阿米巴和碘阿米巴。许多其他大型哺乳动物物种是芽囊原虫属和溶组织内阿米巴属的常见宿主。然而,对于后两个属,在非人类宿主中观察到的物种/遗传变异通常与在人类中观察到的不同,这可能表明许多CLIPPs物种在很长一段时间内已经适应了它们各自的宿主,从而导致了相对较高的宿主特异性。对于芽囊原虫属,我们已经表明,即使给定的亚型可能在不止一种宿主物种中被发现,但在等位基因水平上仍可证明其具有隐性宿主特异性。例如,尽管人类和非人灵长类动物都可能被ST3定植,但ST3的宿主物种特异性菌株在这两个宿主群体中循环。关于结肠内阿米巴,有可能ST1已经适应了人类宿主,而结肠内阿米巴ST2已经适应了更广泛的宿主范围,包括非人灵长类动物和啮齿动物。很明显,CLIPPs是人类背景人群中的常见定植菌,尽管我们不能排除这些生物体中任何一种存在感染的可能性,但在大多数情况下,认为临床和医学干预是多余的应该是合理的。也许甚至应该尝试在这些生物体首次定植于肠道时不要将其从肠道中根除。然而,需要更多的研究来阐明在一些CLIPPs中观察到的显著遗传多样性在传播模式和临床意义方面的重要性。未来对CLIPPs的研究还应包括能够阐明有利于CLIPPs定植的因素以及CLIPPs在宿主 - 肠道生态、代谢和整体健康状况中所起作用的研究。最后,由于人类和非人类宿主共享这些寄生属,并且由于一些原生动物可能对反刍动物的整体肠道功能有贡献,因此研究家养和野生动物中的这些寄生虫,以更多地了解这些寄生虫在健康和疾病中的作用,包括调查一些CLIPPs是否可能是内共生菌,将是很有趣的。