Suppr超能文献

美罗培南与妥布霉素联合克林霉素在晚期阑尾炎患者抗生素治疗中的比较

Meropenem versus tobramycin with clindamycin in the antibiotic management of patients with advanced appendicitis.

作者信息

Berne T V, Yellin A E, Appleman M D, Heseltine P N, Gill M A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1996 May;182(5):403-7.

PMID:8620275
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meropenem (MP), a new carbapenem antibiotic, has excellent antimicrobial activity against the enteric flora commonly encountered in acute appendicitis. Although similar to imipenem, it may have clinical advantages.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared patients with advanced appendicitis (gangrenous or perforated) treated with 1,000 mg MP every eight hours with those given the combination of tobramycin 5 mg/kg/day at eight hour intervals and clindamycin 900 mg every eight hours. Both treatments were given intravenously. Patients were randomized to either group of the double-blind study.

RESULTS

Of 129 evaluable cases, 63 received MP and 66 received both tobramycin and clindamycin (T/C). The two groups were similar in age, sex, and severity of disease. The mean number of days of postoperative fever (MP = 3.1 +/- 1.7 SD compared to T/C = 4.4 +/- 2.2 SD, p < or = 0.01), days of antibiotic therapy (MP = 6.1 +/- 1.6 SD compared to T/C = 7.3 +/- 2.2 SD, p = 0.01), and therefore hospital stay (MP = 8.0 +/- 3.5 SD compared to T/C = 9.4 +/- 2.6 SD, p < 0.01) were significantly better for patients treated with MP. No difference was found between the numbers of failures in each group (MP = 5 compared to T/C = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a small but significant reduction (approximately one day) in post-operative fever, duration of antibiotic treatment, and hospital stay for patients treated with MP compared to those treated with T/C.

摘要

背景

美罗培南(MP)是一种新型碳青霉烯类抗生素,对急性阑尾炎常见的肠道菌群具有优异的抗菌活性。尽管它与亚胺培南相似,但可能具有临床优势。

研究设计

我们将每8小时接受1000mg美罗培南治疗的晚期阑尾炎(坏疽性或穿孔性)患者与每8小时接受5mg/kg/天庆大霉素和每8小时接受900mg克林霉素联合治疗的患者进行了比较。两种治疗均通过静脉给药。患者被随机分配到双盲研究的任何一组。

结果

在129例可评估病例中,63例接受美罗培南治疗,66例接受庆大霉素和克林霉素联合治疗(T/C)。两组在年龄、性别和疾病严重程度方面相似。术后发热天数(美罗培南组=3.1±1.7标准差,T/C组=4.4±2.2标准差,p≤0.01)、抗生素治疗天数(美罗培南组=6.1±1.6标准差,T/C组=7.3±2.2标准差,p = 0.01)以及因此的住院时间(美罗培南组=8.0±3.5标准差,T/C组=9.4±(此处原文可能有误,推测为2.6)标准差,p<0.01),接受美罗培南治疗的患者明显更好。两组失败病例数无差异(美罗培南组=5,T/C组=6)。

结论

本研究表明,与接受T/C治疗的患者相比,接受美罗培南治疗的患者术后发热、抗生素治疗持续时间和住院时间有小幅但显著的缩短(约一天)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验