Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1349-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1349.
Data on research participants and populations frequently include race, ethnicity, and gender as categorical variables, with the assumption that these variables exert their effects through innate or genetically determined biologic mechanisms. There is a growing body of research that suggests, however, that these variables have strong social dimensions that influence health. Socioeconomic status, a complicated construct in its own right, interacts with and confounds analyses of race/ethnicity and gender. The Academy recommends that research studies include race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status as explanatory variables only when data relevant to the underlying social mechanisms have been collected and included in the analyses.
关于研究参与者和人群的数据通常将种族、民族和性别作为分类变量,其假设是这些变量通过先天或基因决定的生物学机制发挥作用。然而,越来越多的研究表明,这些变量具有强烈的社会维度,会影响健康。社会经济地位本身就是一个复杂的概念,它与种族/民族和性别的分析相互作用并造成混淆。该学会建议,只有在收集了与潜在社会机制相关的数据并将其纳入分析时,研究才应将种族/民族、性别和社会经济地位作为解释变量。