Suppr超能文献

生态限制、生活史特征与合作繁殖的进化

Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding.

作者信息

Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J

机构信息

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield

出版信息

Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1079-1086. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1394.

Abstract

The ecological constraints hypothesis is widely accepted as an explanation for the evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperatively breeding birds. Intraspecific studies offer the strongest support. Observational studies have demonstrated a positive association between the severity of ecological constraints and the prevalence of cooperation, and experimental studies in which constraints on independent breeding were relaxed resulted in helpers moving to adopt the vacant breeding opportunities. However, this hypothesis has proved less successful in explaining why cooperative breeding has evolved in some species or lineages but not in others. Comparative studies have failed to identify ecological factors that differ consistently between cooperative and noncooperative species. The life history hypothesis, which emphasizes the role of life history traits in the evolution of cooperative breeding, offers a solution to this difficulty. A recent analysis showed that low adult mortality and low dispersal predisposed certain lineages to show cooperative behaviour, given the right ecological conditions. This represents an important advance, not least by offering an explanation for the patchy phylogenetic distribution of cooperative breeding. We discuss the complementary nature of these two hypotheses and suggest that rather than regarding life history traits as predisposing and ecological factors as facilitating cooperation, they are more likely to act in concert. While acknowledging that different cooperative systems may be a consequence of different selective pressures, we suggest that to identify the key differences between cooperative and noncooperative species, a broad constraints hypothesis that incorporates ecological and life history traits in a single measure of 'turnover of breeding opportunities' may provide the most promising avenue for future comparative studies. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

生态限制假说被广泛接受,用以解释合作繁殖鸟类中延迟扩散的进化。种内研究提供了最有力的支持。观察性研究表明,生态限制的严重程度与合作的普遍程度之间存在正相关,而放松对独立繁殖限制的实验研究则导致帮手转而利用空缺的繁殖机会。然而,这一假说在解释为什么合作繁殖在某些物种或谱系中进化而在其他物种或谱系中没有进化方面,成效较差。比较研究未能确定合作物种和非合作物种之间始终存在差异的生态因素。强调生活史特征在合作繁殖进化中作用的生活史假说,为这一难题提供了解决方案。最近的一项分析表明,在合适的生态条件下,低成年死亡率和低扩散率使某些谱系倾向于表现出合作行为。这是一个重要的进展,尤其是为合作繁殖的零散系统发育分布提供了解释。我们讨论了这两种假说的互补性质,并提出与其将生活史特征视为合作的先决条件,将生态因素视为促进合作的因素,它们更有可能协同作用。虽然承认不同的合作系统可能是不同选择压力的结果,但我们建议,为了确定合作物种和非合作物种之间的关键差异,一个将生态和生活史特征纳入单一“繁殖机会周转率”衡量标准的广义限制假说,可能为未来的比较研究提供最有前景的途径。版权所有2000动物行为研究协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验