Taylor E, Dev V, Shah D, Festekjian J, Gaw F
Department of Surgery, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, California 93305, USA.
Am Surg. 2000 Sep;66(9):887-90.
The proper duration of postoperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics in patients suffering complicated (perforated or gangrenous) appendicitis is debatable. Some advocate a set minimum number of IV antibiotic days whereas others discontinue IV antibiotics depending on the patient's clinical course regardless of the length of therapy. Our objective was to determine whether there are differences in morbidity and resource utilization between the two treatment methodologies. Ninety-four patients with intraoperative findings of complicated appendicitis were included. In all patients IV antibiotics were discontinued on the basis of clinical factors. However, Group 1 patients were given a minimum 5-day IV antibiotic course whereas Group 2 patients had no minimum IV antibiotic requirement. Group 1 patients received more IV antibiotics than Group 2 patients did (5.9 vs 4.3 days; P = 0.014). Infectious complications were not statistically different between the two groups (13.0% in Group 1 and 12.5% in Group 2). Average hospital stay was also not statistically different between the two groups. The data suggest that a protocol with no minimum IV antibiotic requirement in patients with complicated appendicitis does not increase morbidity. Furthermore, the protocol arm with no minimum IV antibiotic requirement led to less IV antibiotic use but did not significantly decrease hospital stay.
对于患有复杂性(穿孔性或坏疽性)阑尾炎的患者,术后静脉注射抗生素的合适疗程存在争议。一些人主张设定静脉注射抗生素的最少天数,而另一些人则根据患者的临床病程停止静脉注射抗生素,而不考虑治疗时长。我们的目的是确定这两种治疗方法在发病率和资源利用方面是否存在差异。纳入了94例术中发现患有复杂性阑尾炎的患者。所有患者均根据临床因素停止静脉注射抗生素。然而,第1组患者接受了至少5天的静脉抗生素疗程,而第2组患者没有静脉抗生素疗程的最低要求。第1组患者接受静脉抗生素治疗的时间比第2组患者更长(5.9天对4.3天;P = 0.014)。两组之间的感染并发症在统计学上无差异(第1组为13.0%,第2组为12.5%)。两组之间的平均住院时间在统计学上也无差异。数据表明,对于患有复杂性阑尾炎的患者,不设定静脉抗生素疗程最低要求的方案不会增加发病率。此外,不设定静脉抗生素疗程最低要求的方案组使用的静脉抗生素较少,但并未显著缩短住院时间。