Hughes K M, Collier B, Greene K A, Kurek S
Department of Surgery, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center/Temple University, Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905, USA.
Am Surg. 2000 Nov;66(11):1023-7.
Blunt traumatic carotid artery dissection remains controversial in terms of diagnostic screening, reported incidence, and management. Treatment options include observation, anticoagulation and endovascular stenting, and aggressive surgical repair of the carotid artery injury. Blunt traumatic carotid artery dissections were reviewed through a retrospective study of trauma registry records. Seven patients were identified from 3342 patients over 3 years. Six patients were identified incidentally during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cervical spine/brain screening and one patient during angiographic evaluation for possible penetrating neck injury without MRI/magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). A total of 189 patients underwent MRI screening over this 3-year period, demonstrating a relative incidence of 3.7 per cent, contrasting with the reported incidence of 0.08 to 0.4 per cent for all trauma patients. All seven patients suffered severe head injuries (mean Glasgow Coma Score = 4.7) requiring mean intensive care unit and hospital stays of 15.6 and 23.7 days, respectively. None of the patients showed evidence of stroke with CT scanning on presentation. None of the patients demonstrated clinical focal neurologic signs or symptoms indicating carotid injury or stroke. Six patients survived their acute trauma and were discharged to rehabilitation after initiation of observation (one patient) or anticoagulation (five patients). All six patients showed neurological improvement without deterioration clinically or radiographically. In conclusion we propose early aggressive screening through MRI/MRA of severely injured patients to detect occult carotid artery dissections. Conservative medical treatment for this occult injury has been effective in this series of patients.
钝性创伤性颈动脉夹层在诊断筛查、报告发病率及治疗方面仍存在争议。治疗选择包括观察、抗凝及血管内支架置入,以及对颈动脉损伤进行积极的手术修复。通过对创伤登记记录进行回顾性研究,对钝性创伤性颈动脉夹层进行了分析。在3年时间里,从3342例患者中识别出7例。6例是在颈椎/脑部磁共振成像(MRI)筛查时偶然发现的,1例是在对可能的颈部穿透伤进行血管造影评估时发现的,当时未进行MRI/磁共振血管造影(MRA)检查。在这3年期间,共有189例患者接受了MRI筛查,相对发病率为3.7%,相比之下,所有创伤患者的报告发病率为0.08%至0.4%。所有7例患者均遭受严重头部损伤(平均格拉斯哥昏迷评分=4.7),分别平均需要在重症监护病房和医院住院15.6天和23.7天。所有患者在就诊时CT扫描均未显示中风迹象。所有患者均未表现出提示颈动脉损伤或中风的临床局灶性神经体征或症状。6例患者在急性创伤后存活,在开始观察(1例患者)或抗凝治疗(5例患者)后出院接受康复治疗。所有6例患者均显示神经功能改善,临床及影像学上均未恶化。总之,我们建议对重伤患者早期通过MRI/MRA进行积极筛查,以检测隐匿性颈动脉夹层。在这组患者中,对这种隐匿性损伤采用保守药物治疗已取得了良好效果。