Lipshultz S E, Easley K A, Orav E J, Kaplan S, Starc T J, Bricker J T, Lai W W, Moodie D S, Sopko G, Schluchter M D, Colan S D
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center and Children's Hospital at Strong, Rochester, NY, USA.
Circulation. 2001 Jul 17;104(3):310-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.310.
To assess the reliability of pediatric echocardiographic measurements, we compared local measurements with those made at a central facility.
The comparison was based on the first echocardiographic recording obtained on 735 children of HIV-infected mothers at 10 clinical sites focusing on measurements of left ventricular (LV) dimension, wall thicknesses, and fractional shortening. The recordings were measured locally and then remeasured at a central facility. The highest agreement expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC=0.97) was noted for LV dimension, with much lower agreement for posterior wall thickness (ICC=0.65), fractional shortening (ICC=0.64), and septal wall thickness (ICC=0.50). The mean dimension was 0.03 cm smaller in central measurements (95% prediction interval [PI], -0.32 to 0.25 cm) for which 95% PI reflects the magnitude of differences between local and central measurements. Mean posterior wall thickness was 0.02 cm larger in central measurements (95% PI, -0.18 to 0.22 cm). Mean fractional shortening was 1% smaller in central measurements. However, the 95% PI was -10% to 8%, indicating that a fractional shortening of 32% measured centrally could be anywhere between 22% and 40% when measured locally. Central measurements of mean septal thickness were approximately 0.1 cm thicker than local ones (95% PI, -0.18 to 0.34 cm). Centrally measured wall thickness was more closely related to mortality and possibly was more valid than local measurements.
Although LV dimension was reliably measured, local measurements of LV wall thickness and fractional shortening differed from central measurements.
为评估儿科超声心动图测量的可靠性,我们将局部测量结果与在中心机构进行的测量结果进行了比较。
比较基于在10个临床地点对735名感染HIV母亲的儿童进行的首次超声心动图记录,重点是左心室(LV)尺寸、壁厚度和缩短分数的测量。记录先在当地测量,然后在中心机构重新测量。LV尺寸的组内相关系数(ICC = 0.97)显示出最高的一致性,而后壁厚度(ICC = 0.65)、缩短分数(ICC = 0.64)和室间隔壁厚度(ICC = 0.50)的一致性则低得多。中心测量的平均尺寸小0.03 cm(95%预测区间[PI],-0.32至0.25 cm),其中95% PI反映了局部测量和中心测量之间差异的大小。中心测量的后壁平均厚度大0.02 cm(95% PI,-0.18至0.22 cm)。中心测量的平均缩短分数小1%。然而,95% PI为-10%至8%,表明中心测量的32%的缩短分数在局部测量时可能在22%至40%之间的任何位置。中心测量的室间隔平均厚度比局部测量厚约0.1 cm(95% PI,-0.18至0.34 cm)。中心测量的壁厚度与死亡率的相关性更强,可能比局部测量更有效。
尽管LV尺寸测量可靠,但LV壁厚度和缩短分数的局部测量与中心测量不同。