Suppr超能文献

一个新的、经过改进的基于人群的加拿大胎龄别出生体重参考标准。

A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age.

作者信息

Kramer M S, Platt R W, Wen S W, Joseph K S, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, Blondel B, Bréart G

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E35. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e35.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing fetal growth references all suffer from 1 or more major methodologic problems, including errors in reported gestational age, biologically implausible birth weight for gestational age, insufficient sample sizes at low gestational age, single-hospital or other non-population-based samples, and inadequate statistical modeling techniques.

METHODS

We used the newly developed Canadian national linked file of singleton births and infant deaths for births between 1994 and 1996, for which gestational age is largely based on early ultrasound estimates. Assuming a normal distribution for birth weight at each gestational age, we used the expectation-maximization algorithm to exclude infants with gestational ages that were more consistent with 40-week births than with the observed gestational age. Distributions of birth weight at the corrected gestational ages were then statistically smoothed.

RESULTS

The resulting male and female curves provide smooth and biologically plausible means, standard deviations, and percentile cutoffs for defining small- and large-for-gestational-age births. Large-for-gestational age cutoffs (90th percentile) at low gestational ages are considerably lower than those of existing references, whereas small-for-gestational-age cutoffs (10th percentile) postterm are higher. For example, compared with the current World Health Organization reference from California (Williams et al, 1982) and a recently proposed US national reference (Alexander et al, 1996), the 90th percentiles for singleton males at 30 weeks are 1837 versus 2159 and 2710 g. The corresponding 10th percentiles at 42 weeks are 3233 versus 3086 and 2998 g.

CONCLUSIONS

This new sex-specific, population-based reference should improve clinical assessment of growth in individual newborns, population-based surveillance of geographic and temporal trends in birth weight for gestational age, and evaluation of clinical or public health interventions to enhance fetal growth. fetal growth, birth weight, gestational age, preterm birth, postterm birth.

摘要

背景

现有的胎儿生长参考标准均存在一个或多个主要方法学问题,包括报告的孕周错误、根据孕周得出的出生体重不符合生物学常理、低孕周时样本量不足、单医院或其他非基于人群的样本,以及统计建模技术不完善。

方法

我们使用了新开发的加拿大全国单胎出生与婴儿死亡关联档案,涵盖1994年至1996年的出生情况,其孕周主要基于早期超声估计。假设每个孕周的出生体重呈正态分布,我们使用期望最大化算法排除那些孕周与40周出生更为一致而非与观察到的孕周一致的婴儿。然后对校正孕周时的出生体重分布进行统计平滑处理。

结果

所得出的男性和女性曲线为界定适于胎龄儿、大于胎龄儿和小于胎龄儿提供了平滑且符合生物学常理的均值、标准差和百分位数临界值。低孕周时大于胎龄儿的临界值(第90百分位数)远低于现有参考标准,而过期妊娠时小于胎龄儿的临界值(第10百分位数)则更高。例如,与当前来自加利福尼亚的世界卫生组织参考标准(Williams等人,1982年)以及最近提议的美国国家参考标准(Alexander等人,1996年)相比,30周单胎男性的第90百分位数分别为1837克,而另外两个标准分别为2159克和2710克。42周时相应的第10百分位数分别为3233克,而另外两个标准分别为3086克和2998克。

结论

这个新的基于人群的性别特异性参考标准应能改善对个体新生儿生长情况的临床评估、基于人群的孕周出生体重地理和时间趋势监测,以及对促进胎儿生长的临床或公共卫生干预措施的评估。胎儿生长、出生体重、孕周、早产、过期产。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验