Suppr超能文献

双效抗炎药物:重新评估

Dual acting anti-inflammatory drugs: a reappraisal.

作者信息

Bertolini A, Ottani A, Sandrini M

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Campi 287, 41100 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):437-50. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0872.

Abstract

Rheumatic diseases are the most prevalent causes of disability in western countries, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are still the most commonly used remedies. However, NSAIDs cause several serious adverse effects, the most important being from gastric injury to gastric ulceration and renal damage. Attempts to develop non-steroidal anti-inflammatory remedies devoid of these shortcomings-especially gastrointestinal toxicity-have followed several strategies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have, therefore, been associated with gastroprotective agents that counteract the damaging effects of prostaglandin synthesis suppression; however, a combination therapy introduces other problems of pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and patient's compliance. More recently, incorporation of a nitric oxide (NO)-generating moiety into the molecule of several NSAIDs was shown to greatly attenuate their ulcerogenic activity; however, several findings suggest a possible involvement of NO in the pathogenesis of arthritis and subsequent tissue destruction. A most promising approach seemed to be the preparation of novel NSAIDs, targeted at the inducible isoform of prostaglandin synthase (COX-2); they appear to be devoid of gastrointestinal toxicity, in that they spare mucosal prostaglandin synthesis. However, a number of recent studies have raised serious questions about the two central tenets that support this approach, namely that the prostaglandins that mediate inflammation and pain are produced solely via COX-2 and that the prostaglandins that are important in gastrointestinal and renal function are produced solely via COX-1. So, a growing body of evidence shows that COX-2 (not only COX-1) also plays a physiological role in several body functions and that, conversely, COX-1 (not only COX-2) may also be induced at sites of inflammation. More recent and puzzling data shows that COX-2 is induced during the resolution of an inflammatory response, and at this point it produces anti-inflammatory (PGD2 and PGF2alpha), but not proinflammatory (PGE2) prostaglandins; inhibition of COX-2 at this point thus results in persistence of the inflammation. Moreover, COX-2 selective NSAIDs have lost the cardiovascular protective effects of non-selective NSAIDs, effects which are mediated through COX-1 inhibition (in addition, COX-2 has a role in sustaining vascular prostacyclin production). The generation of other very important products of the arachidonic acid cascade (besides cyclooxygenase-produced metabolites) is inhibited neither by non-selective nor by COX-2 selective NSAIDs. The products generated by the 5-lipoxygenase pathway (leukotrienes) are particularly important in inflammation; indeed, leukotrienes increase microvascular permeability and are potent chemotactic agents. Moreover, inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase indirectly reduces the expression of TNF-alpha (a cytokine that plays a key role in inflammation). These data and considerations explain the efforts to obtain drugs able to inhibit both 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenases, the so-called dual acting anti-inflammatory drugs. Such compounds retain the activity of classical NSAIDs, while avoiding their main drawbacks, in that curtailed production of gastroprotective prostaglandins is associated with a concurrent curtailed production of the gastro-damaging and bronchoconstrictive leukotrienes. Moreover, thanks to their mechanism of action, dual acting anti-inflammatory drugs could not merely alleviate symptoms of rheumatic diseases, but might also satisfy, at least in part, the criteria of a more definitive treatment. Indeed, leukotrienes are pro-inflammatory, increase microvascular permeability, are potent chemotactic agents and attract eosinophils, neutrophils and monocytes into the synovium.

摘要

风湿性疾病是西方国家致残的最常见原因,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)仍然是最常用的治疗药物。然而,NSAIDs会引起多种严重的不良反应,其中最重要的是从胃损伤到胃溃疡和肾损伤。为开发没有这些缺点(尤其是胃肠道毒性)的非甾体抗炎药,人们采取了多种策略。因此,非甾体抗炎药已与能抵消前列腺素合成抑制的破坏作用的胃保护剂联合使用;然而,联合治疗带来了药代动力学、毒性和患者依从性等其他问题。最近,研究表明在几种NSAIDs分子中引入一氧化氮(NO)生成部分可大大减弱其致溃疡活性;然而,一些研究结果表明NO可能参与了关节炎的发病机制及随后的组织破坏。一种最有前景的方法似乎是制备针对前列腺素合酶诱导型同工酶(COX-2)的新型NSAIDs;它们似乎没有胃肠道毒性,因为它们不会抑制黏膜前列腺素的合成。然而,最近的一些研究对支持这种方法的两个核心原则提出了严重质疑,即介导炎症和疼痛的前列腺素仅通过COX-2产生,以及在胃肠道和肾功能中起重要作用的前列腺素仅通过COX-1产生。因此,越来越多的证据表明COX-2(不仅是COX-1)在多种身体功能中也发挥生理作用,相反,COX-1(不仅是COX-2)在炎症部位也可能被诱导。更新且令人困惑的数据表明,COX-2在炎症反应消退过程中被诱导,此时它产生抗炎性(PGD2和PGF2α)而非促炎性(PGE2)前列腺素;此时抑制COX-2会导致炎症持续。此外,COX-2选择性NSAIDs失去了非选择性NSAIDs的心血管保护作用,这种作用是通过抑制COX-1介导的(此外,COX-2在维持血管前列环素生成中起作用)。花生四烯酸级联反应的其他非常重要的产物(除环氧化酶产生的代谢产物外)既不会被非选择性NSAIDs也不会被COX-2选择性NSAIDs抑制。5-脂氧合酶途径产生的产物(白三烯)在炎症中尤为重要;事实上,白三烯会增加微血管通透性,是强效趋化剂。此外,抑制5-脂氧合酶会间接降低TNF-α(一种在炎症中起关键作用的细胞因子)的表达。这些数据和考虑因素解释了人们为获得能同时抑制5-脂氧合酶和环氧化酶的药物(即所谓的双效抗炎药)所做的努力。这类化合物保留了经典NSAIDs的活性,同时避免了它们的主要缺点,因为减少胃保护前列腺素的产生与同时减少胃损伤性和支气管收缩性白三烯的产生相关。此外,由于其作用机制,双效抗炎药不仅可以缓解风湿性疾病的症状,而且至少在一定程度上可能符合更确定性治疗的标准。事实上,白三烯具有促炎作用,会增加微血管通透性,是强效趋化剂,并吸引嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞和单核细胞进入滑膜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验